1. Registering for the Forum

    We require a human profile pic upon registration on this forum.

    After registration is submitted, you will receive a confirmation email, which should contain a link to confirm your intent to register for the forum. At this point, you will not yet be registered on the forum.

    Our Support staff will manually approve your account within 24 hours, and you will get a notification. This is to prevent the many spam account signups which we receive on a daily basis.

    If you have any problems completing this registration, please email support@jackkruse.com and we will assist you.

What happens when CO2 is added with EMF?

Discussion in 'The EMF Rx' started by Jack Kruse, Apr 11, 2014.

  1. I mentioned this to a friend of mine who is a marine biologist. He had never heard about it, and asked me for documentation. So I've searched for a detailed description or documentation on this mechanism, but without much luck. Can someone please point me in the right direction?
     
  2. *bump*

    Are there really no cites for any part of the mechanism? How about Kolbert's book?
     
  3. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

  4. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Share it with your skeptic buddy.......I'm sure he'll shit on it because it contains science he is ignorant of.
     
    Last edited: Apr 2, 2017
    Optimalbound likes this.
  5. Thanks, Jack.
    I suspect you might be correct about his response. He is affiliated with a marine biology research institution, and this is something that ought to interest them. We'll have to wait and see if it has an impact.
     
    Last edited: Apr 2, 2017
  6. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    We need physicists like Feynman to tell the truth about the false narratives in climate science. If Feynman was alive today he would eviscerate people who think CO2 is causing global warming. Today we have a bunch of physicist who are on the payroll of governments trying to control people into paying taxes related to the human production of CO2. Richard Feynman work in physics is why I know CO2 is bullshit climate facade.
    Instead of worrying about CO2 we should all be far more concerned about all the metals, mercury, barium etc, that is being pumped into our atmosphere via geo-engineering which is supported by the government who want to blame it all on CO2.

    http://principia-scientific.org/physicist-richard-feynman-discredits-greenhouse-gas-theory/
     
    Optimalbound likes this.
  7. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    HUMANS DO NOT CAUSE GLOBAL WARMING BECAUSE OF THERMODYNAMICS: Scarcely a day goes by without us being warned of coastal inundation by rising seas due to global warming by elite leftists who are non scientific.

    Why on earth do we attribute any heating of the oceans to carbon dioxide, when there is a far more obvious culprit, and when such a straightforward examination of the thermodynamics render it impossible.

    Carbon dioxide, we are told, traps heat that has been irradiated by the oceans, and this warms the oceans and melts the polar ice caps. While this seems a plausible proposition at first glance, when one actually examines it closely a major flaw emerges.

    In a nutshell, water takes a lot of energy to heat up, and air doesn’t contain much. In fact, on a volume/volume basis, the ratio of heat capacities is about 3300 to 1. This means that to heat 1 liter of water by 1˚C it would take 3300 liters of air that was 2˚C hotter, or 1 liter of air that was about 3300˚C hotter!

    This shouldn’t surprise anyone. If you ran a cold bath and then tried to heat it by putting a dozen heaters in the room, does anyone believe that the water would ever get hot?

    The problem gets even stickier when you consider the size of the ocean. Basically, there is too much water and not enough air.

    The ocean contains a colossal 1,500,000,000,000,000,000,000 liters of water! To heat it, even by a small amount, takes a staggering amount of energy. To heat it by a mere 1˚C, for example, an astonishing 6,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 joules of energy are required.

    Let’s put this amount of energy in perspective. If we all turned off all our appliances and went and lived in caves, and then devoted every coal, nuclear, gas, hydro, wind and solar power plant to just heating the ocean, it would take a breathtaking 32,000 years to heat the ocean by just this 1˚C!
     
    Optimalbound and Richelle Jones like this.
  8. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    ^^^^ask your marine biologist to check the facts on water. His ideas are really lacking from a physics perspective.
     
    Optimalbound likes this.
  9. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Climate scientists are just marketers who are looking for dollars from governments. Marketing is nothing more than applied psychology. It’s about connecting with people, persuading them, and, if good marketing helping them. Much of marketing is done to take advantage of people by separating them from their dollar by selling and incomplete story of the truth. This is why many people think marketing is a nasty or immoral thing. It is not when you have the proper context down. It is also something to keep in mind when evaluating someone' pitch to you. Marketing entrepreneurs are dopamine junkies that have found their calling. Just realize what is good for them may not be optimized for your biology. HOW SCIENTISTS GOT THEIR GLOBAL WARMING SUMS WRONG AND BULLIED EXPERTS
    And all because a tiny bunch of scientists got their sums wrong and scared the world silly with a story about catastrophic man-made global warming.
    This scare story, we now know, was at best an exaggeration, at worst a disgraceful fabrication. But while a handful of reviled and derided skeptics have been saying this for years, it’s only this week that those scientists have fessed up to their mistake. https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/4503006/global-warming-sums-experts-bullies-james-delingpole-opinion/
     
    Optimalbound, digital and Allin like this.
  10. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Note the amount of man-made light at night present from these images below. Also, note that blue sprites emerge from the top of storms back into space and not into the ionosphere. Is this how the atmosphere dissipates energy? We know thunder and lightning come out of the south pole of storms but TLE's tell us that energy dissipation must occur at both poles of storms based upon their Coulomb forces.

    The more energy these storms have the more TLE's will show them selves to astronauts. I have a sense their irradiance is how we can measure the energy man has added to the environment to cause global changes in temperature and it has very little to do with CO2. This is why storms and TLE's are greater during CME's from the sun. It is also why these storms also emit Xrays and gamma rays more than before and this is the real reason the Fed likes to add in chem trails. They want to minimize the effects in cities to hide the zip code effect from epidemiologists. So far they have. I am paying attention though.

    Any nnEMF we add to the atmosphere will add to its conductance and will create a lot more ionospheric disturbance via these electrons.

    On Earth, water is the universal molecule of energy/information transfer. This is why the wind is ionic, all climate is electromagnetic and it is why life pays attention to these changes. All life is electromagnetic as well. It is time we realize it.
     
    Optimalbound and digital like this.
  11. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Here's what they aren't saying...

    Alfven waves are both longitudinal and transverse wave phenomena which occur both naturally as Birkeland currents interface with out ionosphere from the sun and artificially through HF modulation of our electrojets. These alfven waves are responsible for electromagnetic charge potential in our atmosphere and the source of all lightning discharge on our planet.

    Interestingly enough, these sprites, elves, and jets were first recorded in modern times in 1989, which coincides with construction of global ionospheric heater facilities.

    Although these phenomena have been recorded in ancient past, they are likely the product of increased electrical potential in our ionosphere due to ionic heating via artificial perturbations. And for those who would point to the sun as the only potential cause for such events, Tesla knew that man could control solar activity via the longitudinal communication link between Earth and the sun, called Birkeland currents.

    "Man could tap the Breast of Mother Sun and release her energy toward Earth as needed--magnetic as well as light"~ Nikola Tesla
     
  12. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    The skeptic will say: "These alfven waves are responsible for electromagnetic charge potential in our atmosphere and the source of all lightning discharge on our planet. "
    Thyey'll go on, "Alfven waves are a byproduct of the interaction of the wavefunction on the topology of the medium, not the cause and source of all lightning. They are caused by lightning. They do not cause lightning."

    What did they forget?

    Their conclusions are based on the notion that lightning is generated by the 'friction' of air molecules 'rubbing' together. That logic is devoid of the fact that Earth is externally powered by both cosmic and solar alfven waves via Birkeland current conduits linking all celestial bodies. Additionally, 'settled science' says that our Schumann resonance is a product of lightning. Of course, that is also based on limited atmospheric sciences.

    Alfven(Whistler) waves are "transverse mode" electromagnetic waves in the ionosphere. They travel at Alfven speed(near the speed of light) around the Earth's polar regions. These waves create our Schumann Resonance as they speed around at varying altitudes. Alfven waves increase atmospheric electrical charge and the resulting discharge of that potential is witnessed around the planet as lightning. While some suggest lightning is responsible for our Schumann resonance, evidence to the contrary exists.

    "The strong inhomogeneities in plasma parameters in the ionosphere and adjacent regions can trap waves in the upper end of the ULF range (Pc1/Pi1). The topside ionosphere is characterized by a rapidly increasing Alfvén speed with a scale height the order of 1000 km. Shear mode Alfvén waves in this region can be partially trapped at frequencies in the 0.1-1.0 Hz range. The same structure can trap fast mode compressional waves in this frequency band. Since these waves can propagate across magnetic field lines, this structure constitutes a waveguide in which energy can propagate at speeds comparable to the Alfvén speed, typically the order of 1000 km/s. Hall effects in the ionosphere couple these two wave modes, so that the introduction of a field-aligned current by means of a shear mode Alfvén wave can excite compressional waves that can propagate in the waveguide. In the limit of infinite ionospheric conductivity, these waves are isolated from the atmospheric fields; however, for finite conductivity, ionospheric and atmospheric waves are coupled. TM modes in the atmosphere can propagate at ULF frequencies, and form global Schumann resonances, with the fundamental at 8 Hz. It has been suggested that signals that propagate at the speed of light through this atmospheric waveguide can rapidly transmit signals from the polar region to lower latitudes during storm sudden commencements. "
    https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/649f/e4e06f9bb8d942bd229b49f2d473b051fb83.pdf
     
  13. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Alfven waves in our ionosphere create the Schumann Resonance, to which our biology is intimately tuned. These waves occur both naturally as solar electrical current interface with our planet and artificially via high frequency modulation of our ionosphere. This fact should give cause for concern.

    "Excitation of Alfven waves by modulated HF heating of the ´
    ionosphere, with application to FAST observations"
    https://www.ann-geophys.net/20/57/2002/angeo-20-57-2002.pdf

    While our Schumann Resonance is largely locked into different harmonics, those frequencies can be increased in amplitude. But, changing those fundamental frequencies would require variation in the waveguide which these alfven waves travel.
    Not surprisingly, scientist have been working on that.

    "Using a data-driven, time-dependent specification of ultra-low-frequency (ULF) waves we show for the first time how the third radiation belt is established as a simple, elegant consequence of storm-time extremely fast outward ULF wave transport."
    http://www.nature.com/.../v12/n10/abs/nphys3799.html...

    This is the mechanism I think is driving climate change, not the CO2 story being sold to the public.
     
  14. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Ionic heating via alfven wave generation is critical to climate change. The evidence is overwhelming. Layers of the ionosphere can exceed 3000 degrees in relative temperature. In actuality, that isn't the temperature, it's a conversion of electron volt potential to degrees. In any case, heating our Schumann cavity via microwave heating effect is critical as well.

    Anthropogenic climate change is real. But, CO2 was a distraction from the real causation. JFK once spoke of "a conspiracy so great, the mind can't conceive it"
    http://broadcast.homestead.com/BroadcastTheory.html
     
  15. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    The same mechanism of heating the Earth's atmosphere takes place in the sun's corona. This fact is obvious when the surface temperature of the sun is 5000 degrees and the corona is over 2 million degrees. Alfven wave heating is cutting edge plasma physics and our ionosphere has been an open-air laboratory since the first atomic detonations created Alfven waves in our upper atmosphere.

    Most people have zero idea what plasma physics is much less what it means.

    Today, dipole phased array ionospheric heaters number in the 70s. No wonder our atmospheric electrical voltage potential has increased so greatly, which would explain the recent increase in upper atmospheric phenomena such as sprites, elves, and jets.

    http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/81
     
  16. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

  17. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    HAARP is the energy source radiated up into the sky where the planes and balloons have deployed the ions. Then when those particles (relativistic electrons) rain down on the tectonic plates they make for very strange physical properties on Earth below.

    This is one of the reasons we have seen melted aluminum car rims in Santa Rosa Cali during the fires (Malibu now too) yet we see trees with green leaves in the background. This is the forensic footprint of geo-engineering and electromagnetic fires and nobody seems to realize how they are all linked.

    Cali is the most geoengineered state in the USA because of its produce and agriculture and its broadcast antennas arrays. We're trying to use Cali to feed the country and we think we out-engineer nature. We have people who think if we can perfect this in Cali or the wheat belt we can go to Mars and make life happen there. It sounds hard to fathom but there is a ton of data behind the actions of NASA, WASH DC and Monsanto to prove it. Geoengineering needs seeds that germinate with different calcium resonance. Calcium influx is the key to germination. This is also where we got Round Up The collateral damage of this program is astounding when you make the connections. Few people do because their dopamine levels are low. Why can't many people follow this story?

    LOW DOPAMINE IS A COLLATERAL PART OF THE COLLATERAL DAMAGE OF GEO-ENGINEERING of 3G-5G states and cities.
     
    Richelle Jones likes this.
  18. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    So how do these dopamine cells deep in the brain get the stimulus to do what evolution built them to do? The light stimulus comes from the AM environment via the retina to the brain structure and works via molecular resonance. How much do you know about molecular resonance using light?Sunlight programs bio-molecules in cells (like dopamine) using light frequency to energize electrons and protons in many ways few realize. What are the implications for life? The molecular signals emitted from chemicals acquires an electromagnetic meaning when light pushes or pulls through a tissue and collides with a protein it frequency matches with. In humans this is why dopamine is first created in they eye by AM light. Power in light is coded by frequency, so this is where the pulling and pushing force comes from initially when light crashes into the aromatic amino acids that make up dopamine to slow the light down. When light hits water it also changes its lattice and structure to make an exclusion zone the excludes all things including the sub-atomic sized "proton". Not all protons are the same on Earth. This becomes really important when it comes to dopamine. This makes cell water from a mitochondria a liquid crystal that has a higher viscosity to work with light’s ability to push and pull to do things inside a cell we do not visualize well. In essence, the molecules suspended and inside this liquid crystaline ocean inside us interact by co-resonance just like a radio transmitter and receiver do in your car. If you tune a radio receiver in your car to 106 FM (MHz), you are tuning into ‘biochemical station A’, that contains a special programming information.

    This situation operates this way because electrons in the antenna’s of the reciever and the transmitter are oscillating at the same frequency as the radio waves traveling to and fro. People forget radio waves are a form of light. If your cells decided to change the tension pattern in the cell, by altering the size or quality of the exclusion zone (EZ), this is akin to changing the dial on your radio to 88 FM (MHz). This information on this channel would not be the same as it was on 106 FM. On this station the programming will give us new information about the systems in question in other parts of the cell. This is what happens when dopamine is not made in the eye. It can not unleash the dopamine in the brain substance and this creates a "low dopamine human". Excessive environmental blue light sans IR and UV light create this scenario most commonly in man these days. This link below and my explanation of molecular resonance by light clearly shows us that long range electromagnetic fields from the sun are fully capable of transmiting very complex messages between distant molecules or to molecules or organelles in the same cell or within the CNS with HIGH FIDELITY as long as their emission and absorption spectra match. This is why the light in your environment must be optimized to the tissues in your eyes and brain to get proper physiologic function. Why does nnEMF and blue light harm/kill us if we live under its power chronically? It ruins the high fideltity connection in cells to perform the physiologic tasks required to live optimally. This is why energy and information are lost in cell with high heteroplasmy rates. Being a “solid state mitochondriac” is not that revolutionary when you have nature’s playbook to decipher the Rosetta Stone of life. This paper shows you how we really work and how reward and choices we make create a procrastinating mindset that never identifies trends early enought to adapt to the environmental changes. This is why people find change hard today. We created a blue light artificial sun that robs us of our molecular resonance that made us human. Human frontal lobes are massive amplified with dopamine tracts and this is one of the major difference of the human primate from all others. https://medicalxpress.com/news/2017-10-dopamine-isnt-worth.html
     
  19. So lots of media coverage here about gravitational waves and the collision of the neutron stars they recorded....is this wrong....are gravitational waves incompatible with these theories?
     
  20. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Richelle Jones and Brent Patrick like this.

Share This Page