1. Registering for the Forum

    We require a human profile pic upon registration on this forum.

    After registration is submitted, you will receive a confirmation email, which should contain a link to confirm your intent to register for the forum. At this point, you will not yet be registered on the forum.

    Our Support staff will manually approve your account within 24 hours, and you will get a notification. This is to prevent the many spam account signups which we receive on a daily basis.

    If you have any problems completing this registration, please email support@jackkruse.com and we will assist you.

What happens when CO2 is added with EMF?

Discussion in 'The EMF Rx' started by Jack Kruse, Apr 11, 2014.

  1. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    In the absence of recolonization of the gut microbiome, local extinctions of certain gut critters can become regional and then, eventually, global within the gut. This is a nitrogen story and proton story. When this happens human brain function is altered because of the imbalance of serotonin and melatonin that yokes the microbiome to the human frontal lobes and pineal gland. Just as the tug of Saturn and Jupiter gravity has on the Earth's tilt orbitals to cause glaciation.
    Last edited: Nov 23, 2014
  2. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    The gut microbiome is completely misunderstood by medicine. They are megadiverse ecosystem developed by evolution, where every single species is very, very specialized in how they relate direct to cellular function and direct organ function physiologically.
  3. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Within the gut microbiome ecosystem there’s a huge premium on doing exactly what you do, well. Why? The quantum mechanism says so.
    A natural corollary to high species diversity is low population density that we see in a healthy gut is the evolutionary recipe for speciation because it controls Nitrogen. We get diversity by isolation by distance. This is really why the human gut has shortened in us.
    The built in vulnerability to the evolutionary design was to isolate populations are that much more susceptible to extinction. today's modern beliefs are allowing this vulnerability to be played out in modern medicine, in clinics, and in hospitals where no one can explain where many modern disease comes from.

    It comes from a loss of specialization in the gut flora.

    This built in vulnerability was acceptable to lady evolution since it carried a small risk when the design was hatched, but today it is the cause of human demise.

    But low odds of something breaking badly for the human gut biome in the long run can still be deadly. Here is the modern human blind spot. They do not understand mathematical probabilities because they are not like an engineer or physicist. This process can be compared to a simple coin toss thought experiment. It’s unlikely that a coin is going to come up heads ten times in a row the first hundred times it is flipped. However, if it’s tossed often enough over time, even an unlikely sequence is very likely to occur. The rules of probability are so robust that empirical evidence of the risks of small population size is hardly necessary.


    Today's modern world, on the surface of this planet is this unlikely sequence.
    Last edited: Nov 23, 2014
  4. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    When you understand the quantum mechanism that life employs you must be aware to be cautious from fooling yourself in extrapolating from a part to the whole. I recently made this error with Jeremy. I did that post to show you and highlight that mistake for you all to learn from.

    For example, recent work has shown that changes in land use in the Amazon also affect atmospheric circulation. This means that, on a large enough scale, destruction of the rainforest could result not just in a disappearance of the forest but in a disappearance of the rain.

    What follows this in our gut? As species diversity is destroyed the local atmosphere within the gut is altered (anaerobic) and as such then the loss of the gut microbiome is not the only issue............that change may alter how the gut handles water in the body.

    Re read Jeremy's blog careful with these insights in mind.
  5. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    When you see things as I do, there’s a dark synergy between fragmentation and global warming, just as there is between global warming and ocean acidification, and between global warming and invasive species, and between invasive species and fragmentation, that scales right into my medical clinic in my patients medical histories and the diseases they now have.

    Your gut microbiome provides stability for your human brain.

    When you find 'one thing' that depends on something else that, in turn, depends on something else, the whole series of interactions depends on constancy being maintained. This is why circadian biology in the gut is a requirement for health. Every species in us does a different thing that something else rely's on to allow the body and brain to do what it does.
    Last edited: Apr 13, 2014
  6. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    In the face of these water chemistry changes within the gut, even the gut natural climatic changes to water and sunlight, human paradigms, culture, beliefs, and thinking has created an obstacle course for the dispersal of biodiversity within our gut and it is ultimately what is killing us today.
    Brent Patrick, Alex97232 and Josh like this.
  7. Jonathin

    Jonathin Gold Member

    I have been thinking about when to share this talk by Bruce Tainio from 2006 who is saying many things we now know about EMFs. He was a unique ag expert that among other things developed devices that altered the negative effects of EMF. Here he talks (about min 23) about re-establishing plant (forests) and animal life on a microwave bombared mountain ridge. Small changes can have a big effect. Unfortunately, he has passed away.

    Josh and cinnamon like this.
  8. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

  9. Dextery

    Dextery New Member

    It is time to consider moving to the trees of life.

    Some on this board know of someone who was literally sick all the time until he moved out of EMF hell in Halifax to a more rural area on Prince Edward Island. Labeled a hypochondriac by his ER doctor father and labeled a nut job..."it is all in your head"....by the psychiatrists until he made the move.

    Who would ever thought that non native emf interacting with CO2 is making us sick....It is supposed to be the GMOs or the low fat mantra.

    Does this mean I have to become an environmentalist again in my old age to save the next few generations?
  10. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    When CO2 and non native EMF interact it means you have electron steal syndrome on the inner mitochondrial membrane. When you lose enough electrons you lose your ability to sense the native magnetic field. When you lose your own personal magnetic field what does this mean with reference to the sun? The sun rays become a problem just like it does when a planet loses its magnetic field. This is why modern docs think the sun is bad. It is not. The loss of electrons alters your cells semiconductors to protect itself from the sun. This is also why Vitamin D levels have dropped in people even in the tropics.

    A planet without a magnetic field gets stripped of its atmosphere. A person stripped of their magnetic field loses their ability to filter out the bad parts of the visible light spectrum and since their EZ drops they can no longer make Vitamin D. This directly alters circadian signaling in the brain which relies in proper Vitamin D signaling as a chromophobe.

    This implies calcium efflux begins in cells. It means that if you have more protons to electrons within your cells and your charge drops. Protons are positively charged and lead to a lower pH with destroys the charge in the inner mitochondrial membrane leading to low to no autophagy and severely parasympathetic activity with a heightened sympathetic response. Yes.......Einstein showed us all this. And conifers make more O2 than any other type of plant via photosynthesis.........hence why they are a good sign where one needs to be. Oxygen = electron creation = complex life.
    Last edited: May 14, 2014
  11. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    CO 2 emissions are not enough to cause what we are facing.........but the combo is a big deal. And The Great Barrier Reef is the canary in the coal mine for humanity. 50% of it now dead now in 30 yrs. And Australian health metrics make Americans look healthy.
    Alex97232 and caroline like this.
  12. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Laws of nature are universal here we no longer should need convincing........it is all tied to E=mc2. This is why you dont need further study........time to upgrade what you thought. Einstein's rules are universal.
    Alex97232 and caroline like this.
  13. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    they are working in concert.....read this thread carefully. All of it is directly tied to mass equivalence. Many do not realize temp in the water is a mass equivalence story. Pollack proved experimentally that in his work. Cold water has less mass and more electrons and warm has more protons. The donut hole does the same thing to rain fall in Austalia and this rain falls on them........it can carry less energy than water in the northern hemisphere. Problem is people do not understand how temperature relates to mass via Avagogadro's number. Some of us do.
    Last edited: Jun 4, 2014
    David Limacher and Alex97232 like this.
  14. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Why is this big? Electrons have a very small mass. Most people would think that small mass is neglible in this equation in this thread. In fact most do. I do not, because of what Einstein taught me in mass equivalence. Small changes lead to wide alterations in energy in any thermodynamic system. This is why the brain works on just 20 watts. It is also why cold temps are not hormetic. Cold water controls mass because it has a lot more electrons in it. The electron rest mass (symbol: me) is the mass of a stationary electron. It is one of the fundamental constants of physics, and is also very important in chemistry because of its relation to the Avogadro constant. It has a value of about 9.109... X 10 −31 kilograms or about 5.486×10−4 atomic mass units, equivalent to an energy of about 8.19×10−14 joules or about 0.511 megaelectronvolts.
  15. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Now just to show you the wide reaching impacts of failing to understand how small changes in quantum mass can scale to create wide spread changes in energy or possibility consider this: Avogadro's constant is a scaling factor between macroscopic and microscopic (atomic scale) observations directly in nature...........

    Small subatomic changes lead to wide alterations in energy. This is why the brain works on just 20 watts. It takes an electron and strips its mass and the result is a photon with no mass. So I have been trying all day to show how this effect of the brain scales in nature.........So I am invoking Avogadro's number and the problem has been bugging me for two days. The electron rest mass (symbol: me) is the mass of a stationary electron. It is one of the fundamental constants of physics, and is also very important in chemistry because of its relation to the Avogadro constant. It has a value of about 9.109... X 10 −31 kilograms or about 5.486×10−4 atomic mass units, equivalent to an energy of about 8.19×10−14 joules or about 0.511 megaelectronvolts.

    The weight of one kilogram near the surface of the earth is 9.8 Newtons.

    The weight of an electron would then be 9.1093829 x 10-31 * 9.8, or ~8.9 x 10-30 Newtons.

    The ball at the end of a Bic pen is ~1mm diameter tungsten carbide. At .52mm3 in volume and WC being 8.6g/cm3, we have approximately 4mg of tungsten carbide.

    As of 4AM GMT, the ISS is flying at 413km above the surface of the earth.

    If the ISS flew over your head right now, and you weighed 70kg, the force of the gravitational attraction between your body and the ball at the end of a ball point pen floating in the cupola would be (G * 70kg * .000004kg)/413000m2 , or 1.095x10-25 N, or roughly twenty thousand times greater than the weight of an electron.

    FWIW, due to doppler effects in the gravity gravitational waves coming from the moving ball point pen, the force vector will be lagged behind the location of the ball by about 23m at 413km, or about .003 degrees.

    It just occurred to me that since scientists just have re-estimated the electron weight figured out to 13 significant figures. If someone could actually measure the force of gravity from the aforementioned orbiting ball of tungsten carbide to just ten significant figures, you could actually determine the distance to that ball with a precision of +/-.1mm. Add one other detector and you could triangulate its position, providing you with the ability to read what the pen is writing.............while this is all going on.............assuming nothing else in the universe is moving. yes.........that is how powerful this relationship is. It is counterintuitive until you really get how it interacts. This is why everything in nature is yoked and coupled.
    David Limacher likes this.
  16. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Another example........the smallest gravitational tug of gravity from Jupiter and Saturn cause glaciation on Earth.

    The eccentricity of the Earth's orbit changes over approximately 100,000 year cycles. These changes are mainly due to the gravitational pull of Jupiter and Saturn. All other planets do have some effect but not nearly as much as our two gas giants.

    Mars has a much higher orbital eccentricity than Earth since it is a lot closer to Jupiter.

    The Earth's axis completes one full cycle of precession approximately every 26,000 years. At the same time theelliptical orbit rotates more slowly. The combined effect of the two precessions leads to a 21,000-year period between the astronomical seasons and the orbit. In addition, the angle between Earth's rotational axis and the normal to the plane of its orbit (obliquity) oscillates between 22.1 and 24.5 degrees on a 41,000-year cycle. It is currently 23.44 degrees and decreasing.

    When this was proposed in WW1 people thought it was nuts until this: Everything changed with the advent of deep-ocean cores and a seminal paper by Hays, Imbrie, and Shackleton, "Variations in the Earth's Orbit: Pacemaker of the Ice Ages", in Science (1976)

    As the Earth spins around its axis and orbits around the Sun, several quasi-periodic variations occur due to gravitational interactions. Although the curves have a large number of sinusoidal components, a few components are dominant. Milankovitch studied changes in the orbital eccentricity, obliquity, and precession of Earth's movements. I wrote about this in my book. Such changes in movement and orientation alter the amount and location of solar radiation reaching the Earth. This is a huge factor for Australia because of the donut hole. This is known as solar forcing (an example of radiative forcing). Changes near the north polar area, about 65 degrees North, are considered important due to the great amount of land. the southern hemisphere has two island land masses. This is significantly different than the Northern hemisphere. Land masses respond to temperature change more quickly than oceans, which have a higher effective heat capacity, because of the mixing of surface and deep water and the fact that the specific heat of solids is generally lower than that of water.

    Astronomy today should be making the Earth cooler.......but that is not we are seeing in the oceans today around the two continents in the Southern hemisphere. This is why I pay attention to Australia.
    Alex97232 likes this.
  17. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    The angle of the Earth's axial tilt (obliquity of the ecliptic) varies with respect to the plane of the Earth's orbit. These slow 2.4° obliquity variations are roughly periodic, taking approximately 41,000 years to shift between a tilt of 22.1° and 24.5° and back again. When the obliquity increases, the amplitude of the seasonal cycle in insolation increases, with summers in both hemispheres receiving more radiative flux from the Sun, and winters less. Conversely, when the obliquity decreases, summers receive less insolation and winters more.

    But these changes of opposite sign in summer and winter are not of the same magnitude everywhere on the Earth's surface. At high latitude the annual mean insolation increases with increasing obliquity, while lower latitudes experience a reduction in insolation. Cooler summers are suspected of encouraging the onset of an ice age by melting less of the previous winter's precipitation. Because most of the planet's snow and ice lies at high latitude, it can be argued that lower obliquity favors ice ages for two reasons: the reduction in overall summer insolation and the additional reduction in mean insolation at high latitude.

    Scientists using computer models to study more extreme tilts than those that actually occur have concluded that climate extremes at high obliquity would be particularly threatening to advanced forms of life that presently exist on Earth. They noted that high obliquity would not likely sterilize a planet completely, but would make it harder for fragile, warm-blooded land-based life to thrive as it does today.

    Currently the Earth is tilted at 23.44 degrees from its orbital plane, roughly halfway between its extreme values. The tilt is in the decreasing phase of its cycle, and will reach its minimum value around the year 11,800 CE ; the last maximum was reached in 8,700 BCE. This trend in forcing, by itself, tends to make winters warmer and summers colder (i.e. milder seasons), as well as cause an overall cooling trend. We are seeing a warming trend because of the human effect of CO2 and non native EMF. This is a bad sign.
    David Limacher and Alex97232 like this.
  18. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Precession is the trend in the direction of the Earth's axis of rotation relative to the fixed stars, with a period of roughly 26,000 years. This gyroscopic motion is due to the tidal forces exerted by the Sun and the Moon on the solid Earth, which has the shape of an oblate spheroid rather than a sphere. The Sun and Moon contribute roughly equally to this effect.

    When the axis points toward the Sun in perihelion (i.e. the north pole is pointed towards the Sun), the northern hemisphere has a greater difference between the seasons while the southern hemisphere has milder seasons. When the axis points away from the Sun in perihelion (i.e. the south pole is pointed towards the Sun), the southern hemisphere has a greater difference between the seasons while the northern hemisphere has milder seasons. The hemisphere that is in summer at perihelion receives much of the corresponding increase in solar radiation, but that same hemisphere in winter at aphelion has a colder winter. The other hemisphere will have a relatively warmer winter and cooler summer.

    When the Earth's axis is aligned such that aphelion and perihelion occur near the equinoxes, the northern and southern hemispheres will have similar contrasts in the seasons.

    At present, perihelion occurs during the southern hemisphere's summer, and aphelion is reached during the southern winter. Thus the southern hemisphere seasons are somewhat more extreme than the northern hemisphere seasons, when other factors are equal.
    David Limacher likes this.
  19. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    In addition, the orbital ellipse itself precesses in space, primarily as a result of interactions with Jupiter and Saturn. Smaller contributions are also made by the sun's oblateness and by the effects of General Relativity that are well known for Mercury. The total orbital precession is in the same sense to the gyroscopic motion of the axis of rotation, shortening the period of the precession of the equinoxes with respect to the perihelion from 25,771.5 to ~21,636 years. Apsidal precession occurs in the plane of the Ecliptic and alters the orientation of the Earth's orbit relative to the Ecliptic. In combination with changes to the eccentricity it alters the length of the seasons.
  20. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    The inclination of Earth's orbit drifts up and down relative to its present orbit. Milankovitch did not study this three-dimensional movement. This movement is known as "precession of the ecliptic" or "planetary precession".

    More recent researchers noted this drift and that the orbit also moves relative to the orbits of the other planets. The invariable plane, the plane that represents the angular momentum of the Solar System, is approximately the orbital plane of Jupiter. The inclination of Earth's orbit drifts up and down relative to its present orbit with a cycle having a period of about 70,000 years. The inclination of the Earth's orbit has a 100,000-year cycle relative to the invariable plane. This is very similar to the 100,000-year eccentricity period. This 100,000-year cycle closely matches the 100,000-year pattern of ice ages. So here you see how the gravitational tug of two gas giants can have far reaching effects for life on planet Earth.

    It has been proposed that a disk of dust and other debris exists in the invariable plane, and this affects the Earth's climate through several possible means. The Earth presently moves through this plane around January 9 and July 9, when there is an increase in radar-detected meteors and meteor-related noctilucent clouds.

    A study of the chronology of Antarctic ice cores using oxygen-nitrogen ratios in air bubbles trapped in the ice, which appear to respond directly to the local insolation, concluded that the climatic response documented in the ice cores was driven by northern hemisphere insolation as proposed by the Milankovitch hypothesis (Kawamura et al., Nature, 23 August 2007, vol 448, pp 912–917). This is an additional validation of the Milankovitch hypothesis by a relatively novel method, and is inconsistent with the "inclination" theory of the 100,000-year cycle.

Share This Page