1. Registering for the Forum

    We require a human profile pic upon registration on this forum.

    After registration is submitted, you will receive a confirmation email, which should contain a link to confirm your intent to register for the forum. At this point, you will not yet be registered on the forum.

    Our Support staff will manually approve your account within 24 hours, and you will get a notification. This is to prevent the many spam account signups which we receive on a daily basis.

    If you have any problems completing this registration, please email support@jackkruse.com and we will assist you.


Discussion in 'The EMF Rx' started by Jack Kruse, Mar 18, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Why are X-rays and gamma rays from the sun stopped by atmosphere while they are more energetic than UV or IR light? Doesn't this seem unusual? They interact with the atmosphere but many can't understand which phenomenon act to stop them. In brief, X-Rays have enough energy to ionize molecules in the atmosphere and they are absorbed in the process. X rays have a short wavelength. Imagine a road covered with ping-pong balls. Try to roll a marble across, and it will most probably bounce back and forth amongst the balls, and eventually stop without getting to the other side. Now try a soccer ball. These will cross almost all the time. And now a truck. I doubt that you will find a situation where these don't cross the road.
    Similarly, the atmosphere can be thought as the road in this analogy with ping pong balls acting as the molecules of gas, and EM waves are various objects you try to roll. Radio waves have large (1 meter &c) wavelengths. Nobody or few things stop these waves. High powered light waves in the spectrum have much smaller wavelengths (in μ m), but those are still large as compares to atoms (these are to the order 10^−10 m). X rays are small enough to be obstructed by everyone, thus they interact with our atmosphere and do not reach terrestrial Earth to harm life. This is very counterintuitive to common sense.
    An interesting side note: The reason that makes radio waves are abundant is the same reason why they are harder to use than light/x-rays in astronomy. Because of their size, they do not give an accurate reading unless we employ large telescopes. Think back to the truck. If an ant hypothetically throws a truck at you, you really can't be sure where the ant is located with precision. But if the ant throws a marble or a sesame seed (assuming you catch the seed and determine its velocity), you can calculate the trajectory and find the ant with accuracy in space, and squash him for throwing things at you. The same principle applies when searching for a radio source.
    Tom Nguyen, Richelle Jones and Scompy like this.
  2. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Richelle Jones and Scompy like this.
  3. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Richelle Jones and Scompy like this.
  4. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    drezy likes this.
  5. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    More on RF risks that are coherent with the NTP study of 11/1/2018:

    I have had a lot of inquiries about moves to Puerto Rico after the storm (Maria)........I would be careful about it for two reasons. The destruction will fast-track 5G and the largest radar dish in the world is already been there for close to 60 years. The amount of RF there is astronomical and they have several cancer clusters as a result.

    When it comes to telescopes, there are few as awe-inspiring as the one at Arecibo Observatory in Puerto Rico. At 1,000 feet (305 meters) across and 167 feet deep, the Arecibo telescope is the largest and most sensitive radio telescope in the world. It is used to scan the sky for near-Earth objects capable of hitting Earth mimicking what happened to us 65 million years ago. It is also the LARGEST pulsed RADAR machine in the world. The amount of antenna's in this area is astounding. Blood cancers seem to be on the rise in this region even though it sits at 18N latitude. http://www.rcpr.org:81
  6. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Another incredible article and a rare moment of truth in reporting. Bravo to GQ magazine!

    All of the naysayers who claim that non-ionizing radiation from cell phones, smart meters, laptops, Apple watches, fitbits, gaming systems, etc. should read this. It’s not a conspiracy theory. There are many published peer-reviewed independent studies showing the dangers. You’re just ignoring them BC they ruin your narrative and your precious wireless tech.

    Ignoring the facts does not make them any less factual.

    “It's hard to talk about the dangers of cell-phone radiation without sounding like a conspiracy theorist. This is especially true in the United States, where non-industry-funded studies are rare, where legislation protecting the wireless industry from legal challenges has long been in place, and where our lives have been so thoroughly integrated with wireless technology that to suggest it might be a problem—maybe, eventually, a very big public-health problem—is like saying our shoes might be killing us.
    Except our shoes don't send microwaves directly into our brains. And cell phones do—a fact that has increasingly alarmed the rest of the world. Consider, for instance, the following headlines that have appeared in highly reputable international newspapers and journals over the past few years. From summer 2006, in the Hamburg Morgenpost: are we telephoning ourselves to death? That fall, in the Danish journal Dagens Medicin: mobile phones affect the brain's metabolism. December 2007, from Agence France-Presse: Israeli study says regular mobile use increases tumor risk. January 2008, in London's Independent: mobile phone radiation wrecks your sleep. September 2008, in Australia's The Age: scientists warn of mobile phone cancer risk.

    Though the scientific debate is heated and far from resolved, there are multiple reports, mostly out of Europe's premier research institutions, of cell-phone and PDA use being linked to "brain aging," brain damage, early-onset Alzheimer's, senility, DNA damage, and even sperm die-offs (many men, after all, keep their cell phones in their pants pockets or attached at the hip). In September 2007, the European Union's environmental watchdog, the European Environment Agency, warned that cell-phone technology "could lead to a health crisis similar to those caused by asbestos, smoking, and lead in petrol."
    Perhaps most worrisome, though, are the preliminary results of the multinational Interphone study sponsored by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, in Lyon, France. (Scientists from thirteen countries took part in the study, the United States conspicuously not among them.)

    Interphone researchers reported in 2008 that after a decade of cell-phone use, the chance of getting a brain tumor—specifically on the side of the head where you use the phone—goes up as much as 40 percent for adults.

    Interphone researchers in Israel have found that cell phones can cause tumors of the parotid gland (the salivary gland in the cheek), and an independent study in Sweden last year concluded that people who started using a cell phone before the age of 20 were five times as likely to develop a brain tumor. Another Interphone study reported a nearly 300 percent increased risk of acoustic neuroma, a tumor of the acoustic nerve.”

    Richelle Jones, Scompy and Alex97232 like this.
  7. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    21 yr old video gamer with cognitive de-evolution: The 21-year-old gunman who took over a SunTrust Bank in Florida made five women lie down on the floor before shooting them in the head. Police said there's no indication the gunman intended to rob the bank, nor is he connected to the victims. He told school officials about this fantsy when he was in HS. And nothing was done. Let's blame the guns because the blue light and nnEMF played no role in ruining that that brain.

    Richelle Jones and Dean6789 like this.
  8. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    So why would you need a radiation protection mechanism if the nnEMF in wireless is harmless as the cell carriers say every time they are forced to go to court or Congress to testify? https://www.androidauthority.com/5g-moto-mod-radiation-954955/amp/

    Here are the actions I have been waiting for. When CTIA members start building protections into their devices to limit RF damage you are close to the tipping point of change. They know it is harmful and they know as of right now they have legal protection.......but they are not safe from the wrath of their customers who control their stock prices.
  9. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Kevin Mottus is the director of the Brain Cancer Association and he speaks about 5G millimeter wave radiation dangers at a meeting with the Council Of The District Of Columbia Committee On Transportation and Environment.

    These small cell transmitters will be located near every 2 to 10 homes, exposing families to harmful, carcinogenic, neurotoxic and genotoxic wireless radiation.
    See www.Bioinitiative.org for more info.
    Lethal levels of microwaves are filling our living space as a corrupt FCC facilitates an epidemic of brain cancer in our youth and other horrors to unfold. Our physiology is vulnerable to microwaves!
    Wifi, wireless home phone, smart meters, WLAN, and now 5th Generation 5G will flood our environment even more: Lethal Levels!
    Cell phones are known to increase the rate of breast cancer when stored in bras and shirt pockets, testicular cancer when carried in pants pockets and the FCC lets it go on because they're former hirelings of the industries they're supposed to regulate in the public interest. They have not addressed the dangers here revealed, that other countries have already appropriately dealt with.
    "People are currently getting very sick and dying with neurological disease and cancer near cell towers. There are testimonials which we have from almost every state. With the recent findings of 'Clear Evidence of Carcinogenicity' in the $25 Million US NIH funded National Toxicology Program Study and others like it, we have enough scientific evidence to re-classify wireless radiation as a Class 1 Human Carcinogen like Asbestos and Cigarette smoke. Thus we should be a warning and minimizing exposure, not maximizing exposure as we are doing with 5G which will require the installation of 800,000 new cell tower antennas."
    Contact Kevin via 5gisharmful@gmail.com
    Scompy and Richelle Jones like this.
  10. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Is and has the data changed on brain tumor risk and RF radiation exposure right before our eyes in the 1G to the 4G world that IARC last looked at in 2011? It appears it has. This should concern us all given the recent NTP study final results released in 11/1/2018 here in the USA.
  11. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Did you know RF radiation from 1-10 Hz is capable of ruining your magnetosense in the cryptochrome proteins of your eye? Did you know that these trail of papers have been available since 2004 and it is was found to be true in just about every single animal tested? Did you know that RF radiation has been the most used and abused part of the spectrum of light by man since the 1800s?
    Devices which generate electromagnetic fields include radio or TV station transmitters, computers, cell phones, microwave ovens, power transmission lines, and electrical appliances 4G and 5G internet antennas, and electric cars.

    Radiofrequency (RF) and microwave (MW) radiation are electromagnetic radiation in the frequency range 3 kilohertz (kHz) - 300 Megahertz (MHz), and 300 MHz - 300 gigahertz (GHz), respectively.

    RF and MW radiation are non-ionizing in that there is insufficient energy to ionize atoms. It has been assumed by the US government and their scientists that the primary health effect of RF/MW energy is a result of heating. Dr. Becker was the first scientist who warned the US military in 1973 that this assumption was FAULTY because it was based on flawed science which used poor methodology.

    The absorption of RF/MW energy varies with a frequency that is employed. Today's version of 4G and 5G has had its wavefronts engineered via its pulse rate and polarization to control massive amounts of information to control machines that connect to the internet. This is called the "Internet of Things".
    Microwave radiation is absorbed by water made by mitochondria and the water used in the body by surfaces like the skin, eye, and gut. Whereas RF radiation is normally highly penetrating and will be absorbed in deep body organs. Engineered RF waves will also disrupt the surfaces of living systems.
    Exposure standards in the USA remain based on the flawed methods of preventing ONLY thermal effects of these radiations.
    Research continues on the "non-thermal" effects and this video below shows you just how FAULTY the USA version of risk factors has become.


    IT IS NOW BRUTALLY OBVIOUS THAT BOTH RF AND MW radiation cause biologic effects.

    It was found in September of 2018 that low-intensity RF radiations that were pulsed ACTUALLY CREATES ROS SIGNALS IN HUMANS CELLS. CREATION OF ROS leads to oxidation of lipids and it causes cells to DECREASE THE AMOUNT OF OXYGEN BEING DELIVERED TO MITOCHONDRIA. When this occurs it stimulates glucose metabolism and AMPk pathways. It also means MORE ELF-UV light is released from these CELLS to CAUSE increased MITOSIS which leads to the ONCOGENESIS. Might this be why the NTP study shows that animals exposed to RF radiation have increased CANCER RISKS? WHAT DOES THIS IMPLY FOR US HUMANS?


    Use of RF/M radiation today in our 4G and 5G world includes: TV, radios, cellular phones, processing and cooking of foods, heat sealers, vinyl welders, high-frequency welders, induction heaters, flow solder machines, communications transmitters, cell phone towers, radar transmitters, TV stations, children's radio controlled toys, all WiFI enabled devices, ion implant equipment, microwave drying equipment, sputtering equipment, and glue curing, and microwaved curing of road surfaces.
    Exposure to the very high-intensity electromagnetic fields found in the immediate vicinity of certain sources such as radar installations and TV or radio transmitters can produce electrical shock or a variety of heating effects, which may range from a sensation of warmth to burns and eventual cataract formation. This will be more common in the 4G and 5G cities because of how conductive the air has become and how these waves are being engineered by the cell phone carriers to increase bandwidth in cities. ALL of these things will destroy the magnetic sense and affect the fidelity of magnetic flux communication in mitochondria and the ATPase of living things.

  12. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Let us take a walk down memory lane from my blog where I discussed how proteins change their shape under the power of electric and magnetic fields tied to nnEMF. I said this 10-15 years ago in hundreds of blogs.......Let us put it all together why kids are getting brain cancer at epic rates.
    IT IS NOW BRUTALLY OBVIOUS THAT BOTH RF AND MW radiation cause biologic effects.
    It was found in September of 2018 that low-intensity RF radiations that were pulsed ACTUALLY CREATES ROS SIGNALS IN HUMANS CELLS. CREATION OF ROS leads to oxidation of lipids and it causes cells to DECREASE THE AMOUNT OF OXYGEN BEING DELIVERED TO MITOCHONDRIA. When this occurs it stimulates glucose metabolism and AMPk pathways. It also means MORE ELF-UV light is released from these CELLS to CAUSE increased MITOSIS which leads to the ONCOGENESIS. Might this be why the NTP study shows that animals exposed to RF radiation have increased CANCER RISKS? WHAT DOES THIS IMPLY FOR US HUMANS?
    Why did Uncle Jack say it?
    Water and lipids in cells have very interesting dielectric functions. It turns out the dielectric effects in proteins under the power of EMFs from the sun is exactly why DNA only codes for specific proteins hand selected for how they react in the electric and magnetic fields of the Earth and Sun. The sun and planet's EMFs are called native EMFs. Cells absorb these frequencies and polarize that light internally for their use with proteins those native EMFs work best with electrically and magnetically.
    So how does this all work to build life using light and abiotic atoms?
    It turns out the atomic arrangement of the atoms and how they polarize light and light has to have specific pulses and polarization to carry a lot of information. Information is the key to organizing the chaos in your environment to act coherently to build a life.
    Dielectric is used in a capacitor for insulating two metal of conductive plates of the capacitor. In a dielectric material if you apply a voltage across it then no current will flow through it but the dielectric material will get polarized at the two sides of the material positive and negative charge will present. The easiest way to look at dipole relaxation phenomena is to consider what happens if the driving force - the electrical field in the case of life (daylight) - is suddenly switched off (night time), after it has been constant for a sufficiently long time so that an equilibrium distribution of dipoles could be obtained.
    When this occurs with REGULARITY, we expect then that the dipoles will randomize, i.e. their dipole moment or their polarization will go to zero.
    However, that cannot happen instantaneously. A specific dipole (water) will have a certain orientation at the time the field will be switched off (night time), and it will change that orientation only by some interaction with other dipoles (or, in a solid or liquid crystal, with phonons), in other words upon collisions or other "violent" encounters. It will take a characteristic time for this to occur, roughly the time between collisions, before the dipole moment will have disappeared.
    These collisions all act stochastically. There is no way to count and track them all exactly......so the system has a base of uncertainty. (Heisenberg)
    Since we are discussing statistical events in this case, the individual characteristic time for a given dipole will be small for some, and large for others. But there will be an average value which we will call the relaxation time τ of the system. We thus expect a smooth change over from the polarization the with field to zero within the relaxation time τ. Electric potential and reactivity of life are built into the atomic structure of proteins. That is why DNA only codes for them.
    PROTEINS ARE THE ELECTRICAL AND MAGNETIC STAGE LIFE OPERATES ON. IT IS THE HARDWARE. Sunlight is the software that runs it. Water allows both of them to communicate the information to and fro.
    Water has a normal magnetic dipole moment of 1.85 Debye. Polypeptide protein chains in cells in the α-helical configuration normally have enormous dipole moments.
    These alpha helices have upwards of 500 Debye because the individual moments of the peptide bonds are all aligned properly. This is why DNA has the helical structure it has. Proteins are fractals antennas of DNA geometry. Beta-sheet amyloids do not have a large dipole moment because they are smaller in size and shape and their bonds are not aligned properly. This improper bond alignment is what changes the protein length, shape, and mass topologically when sunlight electric and magnetic fields interact with them. This changes the tertiary and quaternary structure to do different things in different environments.
    To make large collections of proteins coherent and form a living thing you need to link them together electrically and magnetically in some way. How did life organize the chaos of matter on Earth using sunlight?
    This idea implies that cells have GAINED some "electric and magnetic tuning ability" built into their protein structure. Cells that have bonds that do not align properly cannot be electrically or magnetically linked or made coherent.
    Remember, DNA only codes for proteins. Protein structure is the three-dimensional arrangement of atoms in a molecule. Proteins are polymers of specific polypeptides formed by the sequences of amino acids that the linear DNA code provides. This arrangement is built into the DNA code directly. The environment does not toy with this unless electromagnetic waves can alter that code in some way.
    The code of DNA, however, has many other electronic codes contained within it. Watson and Crick did not understand this in 1953 and many in biology still are stuck on their old ideas. This is why man is getting sicker as he adopts 1G-5G. These waves are different software that changes the hardware in ways that do not work well on Earth. This is really what disease is.
    Modern epigenetics and transposons have shown us that Watson and Crick’s ideas about DNA are quite outdated and make no sense. This implies that light hits water made in mitochondria, and that water has free radicals in it that the mitochondrial makes from EMFs to change the DNA code and proteins that it codes for. This means light controls what and how proteins are made in the RER and Golgi apparatus. This idea really holds the clues about how a “quantum evolution” is built around the photonics of EMFs in cells.
    This is the reason why DNA only codes for “suitable media” we call proteins. Those proteins that makeup with tissues only work with the specific frequencies of sunlight that fall to Earth (260-700nm). The key to this puzzle is realizing and understand that with bright light, ordinary optics gains the ability to act and become a non-linear fiber optic communication device for cells. This implies that in the right spectral density, at the right time, everything can become extraordinary using light. This is where life and cancer come from. Well comes from the high fidelity of the solar signal and cancer emerges when the electric and magnetic fields in EMF have a chaotic pulse rate or polarization which changes the software and this alters the hardware.
    This is how life works to the Black Swan Mitochondriac........now you know why nnEMF is a killer.
  13. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    5G cause sulfation defects that CAUSE methylation and metal accumulation in humans.

    I covered the process in CPC#42 on Patreon.

    To understand sulfation you must understand folate metabolism to restore redox detox pathways. The most reduced form of folate 1 Carbon unit, 5-methyl-THF, has a unique cellular fate, the remethylation of homocysteine to form methionine. 5-methyl-THF is produced by the cytosolic NADPH-dependent activity of methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) and consumed by the cobalamin (vitamin B12)-dependent enzyme methionine synthase (MTR). Mammalian cells can also regenerate methionine from homocysteine in a folate-independent manner using betaine (trimethylglycine, a product of choline degradation) via the enzyme betaine-homocysteine methyltransferase (BHMT). Expression of BHMT is limited to LIVER and KIDNEY (Pajares and Pérez-Sala, 2006), whereas widespread methionine synthase expression may enable homocysteine remethylation throughout the entire body.

    Homocysteine remethylation is of particular physiological importance because methionine is the substrate for S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) synthetase. SAM, the reactive methyl carrier, is the second most common enzymatic cofactor after ATP and plays a major role in epigenetics; it is critical in natural metal removal as redox power rises, and in biosynthetic processes including phosphatidylcholine, creatine, and polyamine synthesis; and sulfur metabolism (Finkelstein, 1990, Mudd et al., 2007, Su et al., 2016). In fact, phosphatidylcholine synthesis from phosphoethanolamine is likely the largest 1C sink in adult mammals and consequently the largest source of S-adenosylhomocysteine (SAH) (Stead et al., 2006). Changes in methionine concentrations lead to changes in the ratio of SAM to SAH that impact many methylation reactions including histone methylation (Mentch et al., 2015). The methionine cycle is slowed tremendously when deuterium leeches into the matrix via the broken circadian control of UCP-2 which causes COX-2 amplification. Methionine cycle is subject to the KIE of deuterium. The SAM/SAH ratio is tightly regulated by metabolic mechanisms including inhibition of MTHFR by SAM (Kutzbach and Stokstad, 1971), inhibition of the SAM-consuming enzyme glycine-N-methyltransferase (GNMT) by 5-methyl-THF (Yeo and Wagner, 1992), and sequestration of 5-methyl-THF by cytosolic serine hydroxymethyltransferase (SHMT1) (Herbig et al., 2002, Stover and Schirch, 1991). In mice, SHMT1 loss increases, and SHMT1 overexpression decreases SAM levels (MacFarlane et al., 2008, MacFarlane et al., 2011).
    Scompy likes this.
  14. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page