1. Registering for the Forum

    We require a human profile pic upon registration on this forum. After registration is submitted, you will receive a confirmation email, which should contain a link to confirm your intent to register for the forum. At this point, you will not yet be registered on the forum. Our Support staff will manually approve your account within 24 hours, and you will get a notification. This is to prevent the many spam account signups which we receive on a daily basis. Sorry for the Inconvenience, but we hope you understand that this is needed to prevent the community from being ridden with malicious users!

THE RADIO FREQUENCY EMF thread.

Discussion in 'The EMF Rx' started by Jack Kruse, Mar 18, 2017 at 7:25 PM.

  1. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Mankind has been made "surfers" by governments, militaries, and by telecom corporations dollars. For "oceanic surfers" all over the world, the perfect wave in the sea is a dream, a myth that will probably never materialize. But many "surfers" know that to tame and control waves in the sea is a matter of calculable strength, physics and power. Likewise, dealing with all the possible implications concerning electromagnetic field exposure is an exquisite matter of equilibrium between public health and social benefits. New insights on the current knowledge about radiofrequency (RF) effects on a biological system are being published every week now, yet this won't slow the roll-out of 5 G that ues massive amounts of RF radiation to operate. RF radiation is used on RADAR systems that are shown in the video below. There is now a mounting literature regarding the consequences of extremely low frequency-electromagnetic field (ELF-EMF) and RF exposure on cancer and the possible exploitation of RF in cancer treatment has been thoroughly reviewed in the literature. Sadly too few people or their oncologists know the data. They continue to be fooled by their beliefs. Early in vitro studies of RF-EMF were mostly designed to study the toxic effect of RF on cell by looking at the nuclear genome and DNA damage. Some of them aimed at clarifying the intracellular pathways that would sustain induced DNA damage and cellular fate. Not one of these studies every considered the other genome in the cell, namely, the mitochondrial genome that creates all of the energy needs in the cell. The more energy that the mitochondria can produce at any one time keeps the nuclear genome quiescent. That means that when energy generation is lowered from the mitochondrial genome this will cause and INCREASE of nuclear genomic changes by increasing ubiquitin rates via epigenetic expression. This is controlled by calcium second messenger system. The published research largely ignores these links this is why every scientist believes that RF radiation is safe for humans when this is not true. Watch the aphids on this flower boune every time they are shot with RF radiation from an airport radar 14 miles away........If this affects them at this distance what do you think is happening to your mitochondrial with every spin of ANY RADAR you cannot see in your local environment?
    JanSz likes this.
  2. caroline

    caroline Moderator

    Altho we live in a small village - low density population. The homes are small and older and a relatively older generation so we don't get much in the way of other's wifi signals.

    However - we live approx four city blocks away from trains going to Sydney. Our sleep is not good here no matter what we do.

    I have wondered about the trains many times .....
  3. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Trains use radar tracking.
    caroline likes this.
  4. Scompy

    Scompy Gold

Share This Page