Informed consent n. The act of informing someone that they consent to something containing risk.
It is hard to talk about a middle ground for something like choice that is a fundamental right. When the real risk of something is hidden to promote a mandate your must question the reason behind the decision.
Proximity to power has an unsurprising ability to mutate a pubic health official spinal cord into bright yellow jelly.

https://twitter.com/USMortality/status/1455671034489737223

The art of vaccine medicine consists of confusing the patient while nature cures the disease.

 

NEW RULES: Evidence-based medicine hierarchy principles no longer apply. There is a new Sheriff in town. The highest level of evidence in evidence-based medicine used to be the peer-reviewed meta-analysis and systematic review. No longer. Expert opinion, formerly the lowest level of evidence, is now the highest if it is from any of these sources: the NIH, FDA, WHO, AMA, Gates Foundation, GAVI, or a major drug company. If any of them say “don’t use it,” follow orders. Ivermectin is the poster child here. We suppressed that totally even though formerly it would have been embraced. The world will trust us, not the stupid medical journals. The medical journals that published those systematic reviews will be punished. But it doesn’t matter anyway, since when the AMA says something, it overrides anything in the medical literature.

 

We need to demand better of leaders. Do better. Do not build back the way they want you too. #DoNotComply with tyranny. Silence is only frightening to people who are compulsively verbalizing control, fear, and corruption.

 

Don't believe me?

This destroys the credibility of the research behind the Pfizer jab.
Any regulator will recognise this pattern in which expert staff raise concerns which are dismissed by management because of the commercial imperatives. It is the reddest of red flags. FDA knew about it and are culpable for not even mentioning it in their brief to the advisory committee that recommended approval.
Remember too that Pfizer led by the nose the authors of the trial report published in the NEJM: 'Pfizer was responsible for the design and conduct of the trial, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, and the writing of the manuscript.'
The FDA raised no questions about data integrity and apparently neither did the so-called authors of the publication, or the peer reviewers.
Remember all the hoopla about 95% effectiveness? Based on this?! The reviewer paid bt the BMJ found that it was a compromised process from end to end.

 

https://gemmaodoherty.com/swiss-car...d-for-speaking-out-about-the-coronavirus-lie/

 

https://market-ticker.org/akcs-www?post=244109

 

Pfizer, Moderna, and J&J are going to bring in a quarter trillion dollars in revenue this year. All 3 companies are set to smash records, thanks to COVID-19 boost. No one in the corporate press & hardly anyone in gov't is even remotely interested in scrutinizing these companies.

You have voted in criminals.

Your current Congress and executive branch has more in common with Hitler than any administration in US history

 

In a year that has been filled with so many mysteries already, I have another very odd one to share with you. Emergency rooms are filled to overflowing all over America, and nobody can seem to explain why this is happening. Right now, the number of new COVID cases in the United States each day is less than half of what it was just a couple of months ago. That is really good news, and many believe that this is a sign that the pandemic is fading. Let us hope that is true. With less people catching the virus, you would think that would mean that our emergency rooms should be emptying out, but the opposite is actually happening. All across the country, emergency rooms are absolutely packed, and in many cases we are seeing seriously ill patients being cared for in the hallways because all of the ER rooms are already full.

https://khn.org/news/article/hospital-emergency-rooms-swamped-seriously-ill-non-covid-patients/

Anyone want to guess why?

 

Interesting read here. https://maryannedemasi.com/blog/f/a-credibility-blow-to-pfizer’s-covid-19-vaccine

 

We will remember those who
- kept silent
- citizen-enforced mandates
- turned backs on friends/family
- fanned the panic
- justified the panic
- censored the opposition
- cancel-petitioned skeptics
- argued against “muh civil rights”
- pushed for abhorrent discrimination


In 2019: Proud to serve the public
2020: Proud to serve the masked.
2021: Proud to serve the vaccinated
2022: Proud to repair the vaccinated

 

Nothing to see here......
Pfizer vaccine whistleblower contacts FDA about them falsifying data and not following up on adverse events and they ignore.
Never be silent with persons you distrust. Silence betrays the truth.
https://twitter.com/DrAseemMalhotra/status/1456336316006903813

 

Very healthy athlete comes down with significant mandate complication:https://lemediaen442-fr.translate.g...-une-pericardite-apres-sa-vaccination-pfizer/

 

https://thehill.com/changing-americ...ior-nih-expert-pushes-back-on-growing-vaccine

 

https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id...ier-hospitalized-covid-19-issues?platform=amp

 

I don’t put a lot of faith in FDA approval, but it does mean something LEGALLY. According to CDC’s VaccineFinder website, the FDA approved vaccine is nowhere to be found in the US. How can the government, or even a private employer, LEGALLY mandate a drug that isn’t approved?

ANSWER: You get away with it when the government is filled with criminals and no one in the DOJ speaks up to protect the public.

 

In response to the attorney’s FOIA request, US CDC admits that it has no record of an unvaccinated person spreading COVID after recovering from COVID. Lawyers smelling blood in the water.

 

The debate is over. Natural immunity wins. https://popularrationalism.substack...&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web&utm_source=

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2021/11/12/us/politics/court-vaccine-mandate.html

 

https://twitter.com/NeverSleever/status/1458881248533831696

 

The problems with jabs

1. New technology.
2. No long term studies.
3. Barely medium term.
4. For a virus broadly flu like in IFR.
5. Being pushed on kids who have almost zero risk from Covid, which is ten times less risky than is flu for them.
6. Whereas we have never required flu vaccines for most jobs.
7. We never require vaccines for mere participation in society.
8. All for a virus that much of the population already got and recovered from, and has much superior natural immunity, and have disproportionate risks from the vaccine.
9. A virus that changes — like flu — constantly, and so one will have to boost forever, with a consequent summation of the risks.
10. For a vaccine that does not slow community infection and transmission, but instead may augment it because the vaccinated have suppressed symptoms.
11. For a vaccine that has more like 30% to 70% efficacy, not at all the claimed 95% efficacy.
12. And that’s just at the start, whereas it falls quickly in several months.
13. For a vaccine with orders of magnitude more adverse side effects than we have ever seen in other vaccine technologies.
14. For a vaccine that appears not to have slowed the pandemic anywhere.
15. For a vaccine that may inhibit the development of full immunity if (and when) one is infected.
16. All occurring after a worldwide mass hysteria freaking out and panicking and overriding civil liberties for lockdowns and masks which had no scientific justification and have since over and over been shown to be without efficacy, and have had radical harms.
17. In a context where much of the population is treating the unvaccinated as an evil unclean enemy who does not deserve hospitalization, or entry into society at all. These are deeply dangerous totalitarian forces that have been unleashed, and one is blind if one can’t see how these mandates emanate from these psycho-societal irrationalities.