1. Registering for the Forum

    We require a human profile pic upon registration on this forum.

    After registration is submitted, you will receive a confirmation email, which should contain a link to confirm your intent to register for the forum. At this point, you will not yet be registered on the forum.

    Our Support staff will manually approve your account within 24 hours, and you will get a notification. This is to prevent the many spam account signups which we receive on a daily basis.

    If you have any problems completing this registration, please email support@jackkruse.com and we will assist you.

The 'mask'arade continues.......

Discussion in 'Educating Doctors' started by Jack Kruse, Nov 26, 2020.

  1. Well done - @Christine Renner !
     
    Christine Renner and JanSz like this.
  2. Over the 18 months, I've used all sorts of means to communicate - through FaceBook, MeWe, talking with neighbors, etc. For example:

    Masks - Let's review the science
    This version of SARs - CoVid virus is a nanoparticle. So small, it cannot seen by a microscope, nor can it be filtered by a mask; most gas-mask-respirators also fail.

    Masks will not "keep you safe" from these nanoparticles which are in the air you breath in. When these viral nanoparticles are inhaled, they are caught in your mucus membranes. When you exhale these nanoparticles are enlarged by this moisture you gave them. These larger moist particles are trapped on the inside of a mask. These particles are then re-inhaled, exhaled larger and re-inhaled.

    Please learn the science -
    Viruses are simple biological structures, size in the nanometre range (in the case of SARS-CoV-2, the size ranges from 60 t o 140 nm) and intracellular life cycle, often making their detection difficult, as they are difficult to be isolated and cannot be observed by ordinary optical microscopes.
    The N95 is rated with a pore size of larger than 300 nm and is capable of stopping large moist particles (spit) not viral (60 to 140 mn) particles.

    https://www.researchgate.net/.../340270205_Nanomedicine...
    https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/2632-959X/abb714
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/.../pii/S2666831920300072

    Lipid-Based Nanoparticles have great potential in clinical contexts for COVID-19 specifically nanocarriers such as phospholipids to the pulmonary surfactant biomembrane system. https://www.frontiersin.org/.../fnano.2020.588915/full

    Abstract: Masks and respirators do not prevent transmission of viruses. There have been extensive randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies, and meta-analysis reviews of RCT studies, which all show that masks and respirators do not work to prevent respiratory influenza-like illnesses, or respiratory illnesses believed to be transmitted by droplets and aerosol particles.
    https://academic.oup.com/cid/article/65/11/1934/4068747
    upload_2021-7-31_8-32-45.png

    Ok, so we've learned N95 can stop as much as 84% of moist particles larger than 300 nm (spit) but not viral (60 to 140 mn) particles. Bacteria size is on average 1000 nm. So what's the problem? -> Hospital work safety disputes between unions and administration management.

    It is well known that if you've vulnerable to infection, don't go to the hospital. Can you spell -> Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)

    Over past decade or so of "negotiations" hospital administration are installing UV lights, specifically UVC light sanitization -
    Both are a bit too much for an apartment, so here's something you can put in the bedroom, bathroom and kitchen https://www.amazon.com/Guardian-Pluggable.../dp/B000G2BESO

    In a randomize study of 3030 participants, there was found no difference between mask wearers and non-mask wearers in controlling the spread of CoVid. https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/m20-6817 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33205991/
    But if you are afraid, masks may slow down large particles like dust, pollen, large bacteria and human oral moister like from a sneeze.

    I've spoken with Kaiser Toxicology Lab Analysts who didn't know this; but they are beginning to "see the light".
     
    Last edited: Jul 31, 2021
    Josie Thomson, GavinH, JanSz and 2 others like this.
  3. ND Hauf

    ND Hauf Pleb


    Well put and refreshing to hear Christine...…..
     
    caroline, JanSz and Christine Renner like this.
  4. Freebird

    Freebird New Member

    You did it justice! Very well said, as usual!

    Speaking truth is life giving. It makes you strong.

    Not speaking truth makes you look like soros or gates or fauci.
     
  5. Freebird

    Freebird New Member

    When all the lemmings are running towards the cliff, the one running in the opposite direction is called a conspiracy theorist.
     
    GavinH, caroline and JanSz like this.
  6. Freebird

    Freebird New Member

    caroline, JanSz and ND Hauf like this.
  7. JanSz likes this.
  8. caroline

    caroline Moderator

    Shocking pictures of police intervention in Sydney protests .........
     
    GavinH and Christine Renner like this.
  9. Where are we with most current factual information about cycle threshold differences between Covid vaccinated and non vaccinated?

    How do we know for certain what CT levels are being used in what labs? In other words how that is skewing statistics to make it appear that fewer Covid vaccinated in US are testing positive for Covid 19?

    What about the CDC directive to only report Covid positive breakthrough infections among vaccinated if hospitalized or result in death? Anyone have data on how that is skewing numbers in US?

    In our county Health directing reporting ".1%" of vaccinated "reported breakthrough infections." Not really even sure what that means..." reported".. to who? How? Under what circumstances? What is the likely (actual) "not reported" percentage"? How do we know?

    Also from our county health department: "percentage of vaccinated in hospital unknown". I've asked for clarification...why unknown? I am inferring it's bc vaccinated, if hospitalized, are not routinely pcr tested. But still waiting for clarification on both these points.

    Saw the post about PCR testing being withdrawn 12/31/21...but until then, how are positives among different groups (Covid vaxxed, Covid non vaxxed, and healthy convalesced) being accounted for?

    Source?

    (want to make sure to be sharing most up to date and accurate information only)
     
    John Schumacher and GavinH like this.
  10. What sources do you recommend?
     
  11. Has anyone noticed that people who are "fully vaccinated" for Covid, who experience a breakthrough infection, are now being said to be "reinfected with Covid." Saw this in a couple reports at precisionvaccinations.com. How can anyone call that a reinfection, if the person had never been infected with Covid prior to the jab(s)?

    It gets curiouser and curiouser.
     
  12. caroline

    caroline Moderator

    TV
    I maybe didn't state that properly. What shocked me was the amount of police brought into Sydney prior to a planned demonstration. They virtually shut down the whole city.

    I just kept thinking - is it really any different here than it was in China?

    Will tanks be next?
     
    GavinH and Christine Renner like this.
  13. caroline

    caroline Moderator

    It is so important that we have factual information.
     
    Christine Renner likes this.
  14. I asked because I checked Twitter after seeing your message and "sydneyprotest" was trending but when I clicked on it, the threads were heavily skewed towards all manner of people heavily critical of anyone going...a few pictures of a few "unarmed soldiers"...which makes me think the real scenes are being suppressed. Do you have any recommendations of links that we could see to see what you are seeing?
     
  15. Last edited: Aug 1, 2021

  16. F
    rom the article:

    According to UCSF:
    • In July, 183 UCSF employees or learners tested positive for COVID out of 35,000 people.
    • 84% were fully vaccinated.
    • 2 vaccinated people were hospitalized

    "We were expecting and planning for breakthroughs, that said the rate of breakthroughs is a little bit higher than we had originally predicted," said Dr. Adler. But that's because those predictions were based on data from the original variant, not the Delta - which is twice as infectious.

    But, if there was no vaccine available, UCSF expects they would have four times as many COVID cases right now.

    https://abc7news.com/amp/coronaviru...ovid-ucsf/10920805/?__twitter_impression=true

    Can't make this up...on second thought maybe you can: 84% of cases were vaccinated, but UCSF expects they would have 4 times as many cases if there was no vaccine.
     
    John Schumacher, caroline and GavinH like this.
  17. GavinH

    GavinH Gavin Horner

    https://www.rebelnews.com/tags/australia
     
  18. JanSz

    JanSz Gold

    John Schumacher and Freebird like this.
  19. caroline

    caroline Moderator

    sorry Christine - I don't. We had just seen it on the evening news. We don't normally watch TV but we are watching the olympics.

    I seem to remember them saying that they brought in 1000 extra police to the CBD. Some were on horseback, some on bikes etc. etc. and they were stopping anybody that had ventured into the CBD.

    they already have armed forces in Sydney to help with compliance to the lockdowns .....
     
    Christine Renner likes this.

Share This Page