1. Registering for the Forum

    We require a human profile pic upon registration on this forum.

    After registration is submitted, you will receive a confirmation email, which should contain a link to confirm your intent to register for the forum. At this point, you will not yet be registered on the forum.

    Our Support staff will manually approve your account within 24 hours, and you will get a notification. This is to prevent the many spam account signups which we receive on a daily basis.

    If you have any problems completing this registration, please email support@jackkruse.com and we will assist you.

Natural Immunity

Discussion in 'The Cave' started by DLO, Sep 15, 2021.

  1. DLO

    DLO StarFish

    Michigan: Nurse Shortage Prompts Hospital to Hire non-Vaxxed with Natural Immunity

    Fauci Admits he has no Explanation for why People with Natural Immunity Should Take Vax
    Jackie Nelson and caroline like this.
  2. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

  3. Even though there maybe no evidence to population vaccination campaigns - https://www.npr.org/sections/health...d-19-vaccination-campaign-going-in-your-state
    The data is clouded with expert opinions - Population Vaccination rates
    • The WHO’s "experts" say 65% to 70% will be sufficient.
    • Many professors of immunology say at minimum of 98% vaccination rates are required.
      • “The idea of herd community is to protect the vulnerable,” said Eleanor Riley, a professor of immunology and infectious disease at the University of Edinburgh. “And the idea behind it is that if, say, 98% of a population have all been vaccinated, there will be so little virus in the community that the 2% will be protected."

    With the belief that vaccination is the "herd immunity", we have many US states, countries like Israel have exceeded the WHO’s recommendation and have poor results. This blur of what is herd immunity portrayed as vaccine only is misleading. Eleanor Riley is not alone in this belief. https://acmedsci.ac.uk/fellows/fell...ellows/fellow/Professor-Eleanor-Riley-0016512
    Since we are "talking about" modern (scientific) depiction of disease and "pandemic" rates of exposure, I find it a difficult paradigm for medical clinicians - what they were taught was funded, promoted, and sold by the Big Pharma industry; thus only approved medical practices must complied to.

    Our choice to used these "interventions" may currently be undermining our personal & public health.

    Unless I have the sequencing of events blurred, the "Delta" variant did not become a big problem until the population rate of COVID vaccinations reach a high enough value to exponentially push this vector onto the public through the hyper-shedding following vaccination.

    These current vaccines designed to spike an immune response to a copy of the COVID virus, "infects" every cell within the circulatory system. This virus is a gene editing encoder and it seems successful at snipping out a healthy response.

    Patent 7220852
    Filed April 12th 2004
    By the CDC

    https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-020-01906-4 - For example: "CRISPR–Cas9 uses a small strand of RNA to direct the Cas9 enzyme to a site in the genome with a similar sequence. The enzyme then cuts both strands of DNA at that site. If researchers provide a DNA template, the cell uses that sequence, resulting in a true rewrite."​

    Question: As Dr. @Jack Kruse has shared the history of the genetic encoding of this SARS virus history, it was a potential bio-weapon for a spontaneous cancer response. Even though this COVID version has fallen short of this "goal", has it had some successful outcome towards this intent?
    Last edited: Sep 18, 2021

Share This Page