1. Registering for the Forum

    We require a human profile pic upon registration on this forum.

    After registration is submitted, you will receive a confirmation email, which should contain a link to confirm your intent to register for the forum. At this point, you will not yet be registered on the forum.

    Our Support staff will manually approve your account within 24 hours, and you will get a notification. This is to prevent the many spam account signups which we receive on a daily basis.

    If you have any problems completing this registration, please email support@jackkruse.com and we will assist you.

Low Cortisol Levels

Discussion in 'Optimal Labs' started by Eddie Garza, Apr 29, 2015.

  1. JanSz likes this.
  2. JanSz

    JanSz Gold

    Discussion in 'Educating Doctors' started by Jack Kruse, Today at 12:40 PM.

    Quantum Biology | Explained by Jim Al-Khalili
    May 12, 2020

    Prof. Jim-Al-Khalili explains the emerging field of quantum biology and discusses how this new discipline has developed from its inception in the 1920s until fruition in the late 1990s with the discovery of quantum effects in magnetoreception, olfaction, enzyme catalysis, and photosynthesis. Download article from the Scientific Video Protocols website: https://scivpro.com/manuscript/10_323... Summary: 0:00 Quantum Biology in a Nutshell 0:55 The Origins of Quantum Biology 7:39 Quantum Biology after the Discovery of the DNA 12:30 Quantum Biology in the 21st Century 18:08 Potential Applications 20:00 Leverhulme Quantum Biology Doctoral Training Centre (QB-DTC) ** Quantum Biology in a Nutshell ** If I was to define quantum biology, it is not what many people might think, that at the very deepest level, if you look into a living system, a living cell, down to the level of the molecules and atoms then you hit the quantum world, because that would be true for life as well as for inanimate matter, where the quantum rules kick in. Quantum biology, as we define it today, means exploring the mechanisms and phenomena that rely on non-trivial quantum effects within living cells. By non-trivial I mean quantum tunnelling, long lived quantum coherence and superposition, quantum entanglement. These are surprising effects that we are now seeing taking place within living organisms. That is quantum biology. ** The Origins of Quantum Biology ** We tend to think about quantum biology as being quite a new area of interdisciplinary science and in many ways it is. But actually it has rather old origins, going all the way back to the early 1930s. In fact we can even trace it back to a particular lecture that Niels Bohr gave at a conference in 1929. He hinted at the idea, as many quantum pioneers were doing back then, that maybe quantum mechanics holds the key to so much of science and the fact that quantum mechanics, in their opinion, solved the problems of physics and chemistry, they arrogantly then assumed that it could also be used to tackle the mystery of life itself. Bohr was one of these early quantum pioneers, who suggested that maybe quantum mechanics could play a role. He inspired other physicists, particularly people like Max Delbrück, who then actually changed field and became a biophysicist working in molecular biology and also Pascual Jordan. ** Quantum Biology after the Discovery of the DNA ** The one thing that we have to remember is that quantum mechanics and then developing in quantum field theory and so on was developing in parallel with the new areas of biology, genetics and molecular biology. The geneticists and molecular biologists by the 1930s and 1940s and indeed 1950s, when the double helix structure was discovered, really felt they had no need for quantum mechanics, they were so successful. They were learning so much about the molecular structure within living systems. They saw no requirement to bring in the strangeness of quantum mechanics. So to a large extent quantum biology really sort of went into the background. Particularly after the discovery of the double helix of DNA, spectroscopists and molecular biologists really were learning so much more about the building blocks of the cell, the instruction manual of life, they had no room for quantum superposition and the measurement problem, the uncertainty principle, and on all that silly business, they would leave that to physicists. In the 1990s suddenly there were experimental techniques using fast pulsed lasers, 2D spectroscopy, where you could pump biomolecules, excite them and see how they decay. And suddenly some of these experiments were beginning to show that there were quantum effects going on, long living coherence, long lived interference effects that you couldn’t explain otherwise. Think of the two slits experiment in quantum mechanics, firing a beam of particles, photons or electrons, through the two slits and you see the interference pattern. Even when you fire one at the time, you can’t explain that interference pattern using classical mechanics, you need quantum mechanics. Well, they were seeing the equivalent of that taking place in certain special mechanisms with living cells, for example the way enzymes transfer particles from one part of the molecule to another, electrons and later even protons, 2000 times more massive than electrons, they were seeing these protons quantum tunnel from one place to another.
  3. JanSz

    JanSz Gold

  4. JanSz

    JanSz Gold

    Friday 5/15/2020
  5. JanSz

    JanSz Gold

    Embracing Chaos with Dr Jack Kruse | TotalHealth TV
    •May 14, 2020
    John Schumacher and Dan2 like this.
  6. JanSz

    JanSz Gold

    Last edited: May 18, 2020
    John Schumacher likes this.
  7. JanSz

    JanSz Gold


    One More Reason to Take NAC: It May Dissolve Plaque
    Circulation. 2017 Aug 15;136(7):646-660. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.117.027290. Epub 2017 May 9.
    Potent Thrombolytic Effect of N-Acetylcysteine on Arterial Thrombi.

    We provide evidence that NAC is an effective and safe alternative to currently available antithrombotic agents to restore vessel patency after arterial occlusion.

    © 2017 American Heart Association, Inc.

    Last edited: May 16, 2020
    John Schumacher likes this.
  8. JanSz

    JanSz Gold

    Sperti Red EMF Measurement
    Apr 29, 2020

    Sunworshiper123 likes this.
  9. JanSz

    JanSz Gold

    Now is 5/17/2020 10:15 EST
  10. JanSz

    JanSz Gold

  11. JanSz

    JanSz Gold

  12. JanSz

    JanSz Gold

  13. JanSz

    JanSz Gold

  14. JanSz

    JanSz Gold

    2008 Nobel Prize winner Luc Montagnier says that COVID-19 coronavirus disease was artificially created in a lab by biologists working on an AIDS vaccine.


    Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-1 gp120 and Gag

    We are currently witnessing a major epidemic caused by the 2019 novel coronavirus (2019- nCoV). The evolution of 2019-nCoV remains elusive. We found 4 insertions in the spike glycoprotein (S) which are unique to the 2019-nCoV and are not present in other coronaviruses. Importantly, amino acid residues in all the 4 inserts have identity or similarity to those in the HIV-1 gp120 or HIV-1 Gag. Interestingly, despite the inserts being discontinuous on the primary amino acid sequence, 3D-modelling of the 2019-nCoV suggests that they converge to constitute the receptor binding site. The finding of 4 unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV, all of which have identity /similarity to amino acid residues in key structural proteins of HIV-1 is unlikely to be fortuitous in nature. This work provides yet unknown insights on 2019-nCoV and sheds light on the evolution and pathogenicity of this virus with important implications for diagnosis of this virus.
    Pinned by sixesfullofnines
    Peter Jackson 1 week ago (edited)
    What the Professor says is supported by the facts indicating that the virus was designed in the USA by Fauci’s NIAID and engineered and manufactured in China in the Wuhan Viral Laboratory as the evidence is overwhelming that it did,
    but what was the purpose of the research that was funded there by EcoHealth (linked to WHO and the Gates Foundation)
    on behalf of Fauci's NIAD
    and the US Dept of Defense
    after the gain of function on this type of virus was controlled in the US after Fauci funded research in this area at the Universities of Texas and North Carolina that included funding for the Wuhan Batwoman (Shi Li Zeng) to collect bat viruses.
    We also need to know what was the involvement of CSIRO where Batman Mr Zang studied bat viruses?
    Did the Wuhan study have anything to do with the Gates Funded Global Vaccination Initiative (GAVI) in which Fauci and other close to this event are involved?
    Robert Kennedy explains the sequence of events here and the supporting evidence follows:

    https://www.nature.com/articles/nm.3985?fbcldi=lwAROiTTfDIT-uxNFPtvQH-xFrF6QaF1hKE1Ey2TPrEi17XfFUIbpUIAosDc https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2012-7 https://www.veteranstoday.com/2020/05/03/pravda-us-army-created-covid-19-in-2015-research-proofs-or-debunking-you-pick/
    https://www.phe.gov/s3/dualuse/documents/gain-of-function.pdf https://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2017/12/feds-lift-gain-function-research-pause-offer-guidance


    Last edited: May 18, 2020
  15. JanSz

    JanSz Gold

    COVID-19 And Vaccines- Interview with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

    •May 8, 2020


    361K subscribers

    Kennedy goes on to share some of his insights and take on what Judy discusses in her book, the potential relationship between the flu vaccine and COVID-19, and his views on the COVID-19 vaccines currently being fast-tracked.
    • Dangerous coronavirus experiments led by Dr. Anthony Fauci went on in the U.S. until 2014 when President Obama ordered the work to stop due to safety violations at three biolabs. Fauci then moved the operations to the Wuhan lab in China and continued coronavirus experiments right up until the time that the COVID-19 pandemic occurred
    • The COVID-19 epidemic may have been generated to ensure that dangerous coronavirus research would continue and receive fresh funding
    • To accelerate a virus’ evolution, you grow it in several types of animal tissue, such as pangolin kidney tissue followed by feral monkey kidney cells and mouse brain tissue
    • Each time you transfer the virus to another animal tissue, mutations occur. There’s also evidence showing these animal cell lines are contaminated with coronaviruses and retroviruses, which end up contaminating the vaccines grown in them
    • Coronavirus vaccine development has proven very difficult over the past 30 years, as the vaccines create very robust antibody response, but when the patient encounters the wild virus, they become severely ill and often die — a reaction known as paradoxical immune response or paradoxical immune enhancement

    Read more: https://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/05/10/is-there-a-vaccine-for-coronavirus.aspx?cid_source=bitchute&cid_medium=video&cid=health_COVID-19-And-Vaccines-Robert-F-Kennedy-Jr&redir_token=QdTT3jZBxH0fScTuVkR2Nhf_FPt8MTU4OTg5OTE0OUAxNTg5ODEyNzQ5&event=video_description&v=8WJCbCWFBMQ

    SARS-CoV-2- Interview with Judy Mikovits https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL7YKya_R1ROtw9KhTzAku6bCTsU_ZJIRP

    Subscribe for the latest health news: https://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=http://bit.ly/2qLgWRW&redir_token=QdTT3jZBxH0fScTuVkR2Nhf_FPt8MTU4OTg5OTE0OUAxNTg5ODEyNzQ5&event=video_description&v=8WJCbCWFBMQ

    Visit our website: http://bit.ly/2CA9VGn

    Listen to our podcasts: https://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=http://bit.ly/2X87Z18&redir_token=QdTT3jZBxH0fScTuVkR2Nhf_FPt8MTU4OTg5OTE0OUAxNTg5ODEyNzQ5&event=video_description&v=8WJCbCWFBMQ

    Subscribe to our Bitchute channel: https://www.youtube.com/redirect?q=http://bit.ly/2VoirD2&redir_token=QdTT3jZBxH0fScTuVkR2Nhf_FPt8MTU4OTg5OTE0OUAxNTg5ODEyNzQ5&event=video_description&v=8WJCbCWFBMQ

    Visit our shop: https://shop.mercola.com/
    Find us on Social Media MeWe: https://mewe.com/p-front/dr.josephmer...
    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/drmercola Twitter: https://twitter.com/mercola
    Science & Technology
    Last edited: May 18, 2020
  16. JanSz

    JanSz Gold



    By now, everyone recognizes Dr. Anthony Fauci. The director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases is one of the most cited immunology researchers of all time and unquestionably one of the most acclaimed. As specified in his own bio, his deep expertise is in research of immune-mediated and infectious disease, particularly their basic mechanisms and treatments. During this COVID-19 pandemic, Dr. Fauci has been a central figure, a key adviser to President Trump and a man to whom the entire country, indeed the world, looks for wisdom and expertise.

    However, our elected representatives, the public and the media misunderstand his focused role and even his expertise as a scientist. Basic science underlying a viral pandemic is absolutely critical. But now is the time for the design of sound public policy — and that involves a far broader formulation than a single-minded focus on stopping COVID-19 at all costs.

    Policymakers and the public have not received several key messages that are critical to alleviate fear and guide a safe reopening of society. That has led to a gross failure in policy at the state level:

    • There has been a failure to remind everyone that the stated goal of the policy – total lockdown and whole-population isolation – has been accomplished in most of the United States, including the epicenter of New York. Specifically, two curves, hospitalizations per day and deaths per day, have flattened. The goal was to prevent hospital overcrowding and, aside from a few in the New York area, hospitals were not overcrowded. Today, most hospitals stand under-filled, necessitating layoffs of personnel. More importantly, it was never a policy goal to eliminate all cases of COVID-19. That is impossible, unnecessary and illogical, when 99 percent of infected people have no significant illness from it.
    • There has been a failure to reassure everyone that we fully anticipate more cases will occur, whether we test or not, with continuing relaxation of today’s isolation. Since millions of people have the highly contagious infection, and half are entirely asymptomatic, that spread is fully expected. Even though we will see headlines sensationalizing the next projection, the models are already set to adjust upward for less strict isolation. We also know those same models will project more deaths, because they extrapolate from what happened in the past. Governors rushed to confine everyone in low-risk groups, yet failed to protect nursing homes, the one group needing strict isolation and testing from Day One. Due to that inexplicable error, nursing home residents constitute most of the deaths in many states, and more than a third nationwide. The coming projection uptick is not a cause for fear or panic. It only reinforces the need for new policies targeted to specifically protect that clearly defined high-risk group.
    • There has been a failure to educate the public that the overall fatality rate is not only far lower than previously thought but is extremely low in almost everyone other than the elderly. In Detroit’s Oakland County, 77 percent of deaths were of those over 70; 92 percent were of people over 60, similar to what was noted in New York and worldwide. While somehow escaping attention, updated infection fatality rates (IFR) are less than or equal to seasonal flu for those under 60 in France, Spain and the Netherlands. Less than 1 percent of deaths occur in the absence of underlying conditions. Of the exceptionally rare deaths in children in New York City, only one tragic case out of 15,756 COVID-19 deaths – 0.006 percent – was a child without a known underlying condition. Similarly, the likelihood of serious disease requiring hospitalization is far higher for older people and those with certain underlying conditions. In New York City, the hospitalization rate for those over age 75 is approximately 10 times that for ages 18- 44, and more than 100 times that for those under 18. Under 1 percent of New York City hospitalizations have been patients under 18.
    • There has been a failure to clarify to parents the truth about the extremely low risk to children, and that has accompanied a gross failure to offer a rational medical perspective regarding schools reopening. Younger, healthier people have virtually zero risk of death and an extremely small risk of serious disease. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) states that of 54,861 U.S. deaths from COVID-19, only 12, or 0.02 percent, have been in children under 14. That compares to CDC estimates that childhood deaths from influenza are nearly 600 in the most recent data. Of 15,756 deaths in New York City, only eight, or 0.05 percent, have been in those under 18, a pattern confirmed globally. In France, the fatality rate estimated for those under 20 is close to zero, at 0.001 percent; in Spain, it’s similar.
    In children, despite exceptionally rare cases, COVID-19 is not a significant risk — even compared to influenza. The CDC stated on May 15 that “for children (0-17 years), COVID-19 hospitalization rates are much lower than influenza hospitalization rates at comparable time points during recent influenza seasons.” A May 11 study of 46 North American pediatric hospitals in JAMA Pediatrics put forth the appropriate medical perspective from the data: 1.) “the overall burden of COVID-19 infection in children remains relatively low compared with seasonal influenza”; 2.) “the severity of illness in infants and children with COVID-19 (is) far less than that documented in adults”; and 3.) “our data indicate that children are at far greater risk of critical illness from influenza than from COVID-19.”

    Americans must try to accept what all doctors know: Exceptions exist with virtually every infection, but those do not outweigh the overwhelming evidence to the contrary. Exceptions exist in this infection, some even tragic, including reports of an extremely rare disorder similar to the rare Kawasaki disease that occurs every year in about 2,000 to 4,000 children in the U.S. Public statements by scientists and the media that sensationalize these extremely rare instances are particularly harmful, because they instill undue fear and provoke extraordinarily harmful, misguided policies from people who lack a medical perspective.

    We must not forget that total lockdown – not the virus – is generating catastrophic harms. Restricting other medical care and instilling fear in the public is creating a massive health disaster, in addition to severe economic harms that could generate a world poverty crisis. In the U.S. alone, 150,000 new cancer cases arise every month among patients, and most have not been seen; of the 650,000 U.S. cancer patients receiving chemotherapy, an estimated half are missing their treatments. Half of urgent-care patients are not seeking medical attention; two-thirds of physical therapy is not being administered. Transplants from living donors are down almost 85 percent. Emergency stroke evaluations are down 40 percent. And that doesn’t include the two-thirds to three-fourths of people who are skipping cancer screenings, and the more than half of children who are failing to receive vaccinations, all pointing to a massive future health disaster.

    Here’s the real failure: Public policy must never be one-dimensional. It can never be foisted on people without careful consideration of its consequences, including the harms from the well-intentioned attempt to solve the initial problem. True leadership demands far more than empathy and caution. Leaders are expected to rationally integrate the evidence, even if complicated, and then apply policies using common sense and a knowledge-based perspective. Conveying rational thinking is how to reassure the public and instill confidence in a chosen pathway.

    The total lockdown may have been justified at the start of this pandemic, but it must now end — smartly, without irrational, unnecessary requirements contrary to medical science, common sense and logic. The goal of the strict isolation was accomplished in the overwhelming majority of places. We have direct data on risk and extensive experience, individually and as a nation, with managing it, even as new cases arise. We know that gradually relaxing total isolation will lead to more infections, but that’s acceptable, given that we know whom to protect and this disease is not harmful to the vast majority of infected people.

    As I and others have written, the way to prevent more death and severe illness is to finally, strictly protect those known to be vulnerable. It’s time to stop the cycle of becoming frantic as we see what are totally expected changes in hypothetical projections. Instead, let’s use empirical evidence and established medical science.

    The time of failed leadership must end, or we are committing national suicide.

    Scott W. Atlas, MD, is the David and Joan Traitel Senior Fellow at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution and the former chief of neuroradiology at Stanford University Medical Center.
    Last edited: May 18, 2020
  17. JanSz

    JanSz Gold

    Last edited: May 18, 2020
  18. JanSz

    JanSz Gold

  19. JanSz

    JanSz Gold

    What is 4D printing?
    4D printing is essentially the process of giving 3D structures the ability to change
    shape or form overtime.
    During the 4D printing process a 3D structure will transform by themselves using heat, water, sound or vibration as its energy source. The name diverts from the 3D structured state, added to ‘time’, equals this new 4th dimension. 4D printing is what happens after the printing is processed.

    How does 4D printing work?
    During the 3D printing process, where a machine is programed to construct a structure layer by layer, a precise geometric code is added to create 4D printing. This coding is based on the shape’s exact angles and dimensions. It gives the shape a ‘memory’ by giving directions to its components on which way to move or how to change once confronted with certain environmental influences. It will predict how the shape will adapt when faced with an energy source such as, water, heat and sound. This process changes a standard static 3D shape into a responsive object, or ‘smart object’, which ultimately means they can self-assemble, move and adapt to a change in the environment.

    3D printers vs 4D printers
    3D printers use modern technology to build a tangible structure layer by layer and 3D technology has progressed dramatically. 3D printing is now being used to build houses and in the medical industry, they are using the technology to rebuild prosthetic limbs and organs.

    4D printers don’t actually exist as a functioning machine. Instead, you’ll need to use a 3D printer to create the static object and to add all the 4D coding before subjecting the object to the elements that encourage the shape to alter. This means that at this point in time, 4D printing cannot exist without a 3D printer, so, there’s still room in the future for both types of technology.

    Advantages of 4D printing
    One of the main advantages is you can create large 3D objects that would normally be too
    big to fit into a regular 3D printer. By using the 4D printing technique you can create a smaller object in its first form, which can then spring or fold out into a larger object in its secondary form. 4D printing can be used on lots of different types of materials than originally through. Everything from jelly to wood can be processed, so you can clearly foresee the great potential in 4D printing.

    4D Printing and Medicine
    Medicine and healthcare is one of the industries that could potentially benefit the most from 4D printing. There are already examples of 4D printing being used to create biomedical splints that can adapt to the environment. For example, doctors at the University of Michigan’s CS Mott Children’s Hospital developed an airway splint using 4D printing. This splint stops the baby’s airway from collapsing as it expands when the child grows. The splint was created for use in the neonatal intensive care unit to help babies until their airways are strong enough to support themselves.
    Now, the focus is on creating small, implantable devices says Genetic Engineering and Technology News. The aim is to create a small implantable device for diagnosis and treatment that is soft and flexible. This means it will be less painful to insert and minimally invasive. Moving forward, there is the potential for doctors and researchers to create even more amazing and beneficial innovations. There is hope that 4D printing could become the way forward for creating artificial organs for those who need an organ transplant. Another area of medicine that could benefit is prosthetics, as prosthetic limbs made using 4D printing could improve patient comfort and also act as a solution for children with prosthetics who are still growing and need their prosthetics to adapt.
  20. JanSz

    JanSz Gold


    Kruse Longevity Center shared a link.
    Admin · 16 hrs
    Neutrinos comes in three flavors or types, referred to as muon, tau and electron. These flavors are able to oscillate/vibrate - this is called a "flip" from one type to another - during flight through a charged field. We just gave another Nobel Prize away in physics in 2015 for this discovery, but the discovery was just a half truth because it props up the Standard Model of particle physics. It appears now we're getting closer to understanding why matter exists at all in the universe and it is tied to this small particle, the neutrino.

    I did an epic April 2016 webinar on this topic at over 3 hours. I told my members then that I believed the neutrino was the key to understaning how life is able to do the things it can.

    Today we are a step closer to understanding the most common particle the sun emits in our solar system.

    Here is the key mystery: The mass/energy of the muon neutrino is 170keV. This is almost a hundred times the mass/energy of the electron neutrino, which has a mass of 2.2eV. And it is almost a hundred times smaller than the tau neutrino, at 15.5 MeV. How can particles with such different energies “oscillate”, one becoming the other when they do not interact much with matter?

    Might it be the electromagnetic field that causes them to change immediately? Does not living things emit its own field? Yep.

    Could this be what life is really doing to take advantage of valence shell electrons to change matter in us?

    Could they be used to transmute atoms in us to things we need?

    Remember in particle physics we are using mass equivalence left to right. E = mc2..........Well this discrepancy cannot be resolved at any level by the mainstream dogma but we can gave a Nobel Prize in 2015 for this topic with many unresolved answers?


    Three physicists stumbled across an unexpected relationship between some of the most ubiquitous objects in math.

    Neutrinos Lead to Unexpected Discovery in Basic Math | Quanta Magazine
    John Schumacher likes this.

Share This Page