In November of 2017 the federal National Center for Health Statistics released the preliminary results of a study that showed between 2014 and 2016 the number of 3 to 17-year olds diagnosed with autism rose by 23%, yielding a new autism rate of 2.76%, or 1 in 36 children, and 3.63%, or 1 in 28 boys.

The numbers of children with developmental disabilities in general (including but not limited to ASD) is staggering at this point.

What is being done about this growing epidemic?

Why is there silence?

What will this look like in 10 years???

50 years ago the risk of autism was 1 in 10,000 in the USA and now in Orange County California, it is 1 in 37 children. "No child should feel unsafe" in schools was tweeted out today by our leaders. We hear about school shootings all the time now and the government is worried about gun violence and the use of guns to kill quickly, yet there is a serious double-standard with respect to risks in our schools:

1. It's not okay to be damaged quickly by acute lead toxicity apparently

2. It's okay to be damaged slowly by the cell towers on the roof and the Wifi in the rooms???

WE the people need to demand that our government uses the precautionary principle and it should be applied to any force that damages our children. Personally, my heart aches for any child damaged via any possible method. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db291.pdf

 

A new podcast is out today. If you listen at 2:48 you'll get the English version. I talk about autism in this podcast in kids. From the World War I to the present, the level of non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation in homes increased about 100 000 times. Тhe intensity of the microwaves is 1 000 000 000 000 000 000 (billion billions) higher than the intensity of the microwaves that exist in nature. That's too much, for most humans, cells, and tissue with high metabolic demands can't stand it. The prevalence of autism grows exponentially everywhere, in line with the aggressive expansion of mobile telephony and Wi-Fi technology. In my opinion, looking more carefully without industry-funded studies on non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation would be wise. For many years, there has been a fatal misconception that non-ionizing radiation is not dangerous because there is no photon energy required for the ionization of atoms and molecules. It's the same as saying that black mamba is not dangerous because it can't hit a man with a fist. I currently believe nnEMF is the primary cause of autism and not vaccines. https://youtu.be/9pBqdsMjtOE

 

Thanks for the link I will take the time to listen. The cause of autism appears to be multifactorial. For sure nnEMF is damaging children. I am trying to understand why my first child would have autism and my second does not. Since the egg that created my second child should have had more deuterium (if I remember correctly from my consult). Both are boys. I did not change my nnEMF exposure with my second pregnancy. I didn't learn about nnEMF until this past year. I did between my first and second change my diet and work my health. Did changing my diet effect my health enough for a short period of time that I had less deuterium on board? Was my worsening hyperemesis with my second pregnancy perhaps protective? My second child is completely vaccine free. I am trying to connect the dots between information I have already learned and this information I am trying to learn now. My oldest was born with torticollis and had feeding difficulties from birth with FTT. He was only breastfed for four months due to extreme food intolerances. He required hydrolyzed formula. With my second I eliminated many, many foods from my diet and was able to provide him with breast milk until 18 months of age. He did not experience FTT. How did longer breastfeeding have an impact, maybe better quality DHA for longer? My second child is not only neurotypical but actually developmentally ahead (particularly with speech and social interactions). How does deuterium play a role in why my children have had such different start to life? Would breast feeding for 18 months deplete DHA in my body? I was taking a DHA supplement but didn't know that eating seafood was far superior.

 

Would breast feeding for 18 months deplete DHA in my body? yes especially if you don't eat enough seafood or you are chronically blue light toxic.

 

My oldest was born with torticollis and had feeding difficulties from birth with FTT. He was only breastfed for four months due to extreme food intolerances. He required hydrolyzed formula.
===========================

In normal situation:
mother (adult person) by pregnancy, birth, breastfeeding depletes her Deuterium storage (good).

Her babies, to grow benefit from that additional deuterium, and grow.

But,
your first born might have gotten (too much Deuterium).
Consider consulting CignatureHealth
getting Breathy and Urine test
ask them for advice.

In normal healthy babies high D is good
but
too much of a good thing may be bad

.................

 

Hello,
I just wondered how your son was getting on now and if you don't mind me asking what you've been finding most helpful?

One doctor told me that he thought autism was more common in first children because the mother dumps a massive toxic load into the first child (nature guesses you might well mess things up the first time and so dumping toxins benefits your long-term fertility as it will go better for following children). That was one theory anyway... I've no idea if it's true. He thought that when second or subsequent children were affected it was more likely to be down to infection (Lyme etc).

 

Autism would be expected to be more common in first children because it's a wake up call to the parents to do something different with later children, like dropping out of the vaccine program.

 

I was thinking of your comment when reading this: HOBERMAN, H. D., METZ, C. B., & GRAFF, J. (1952). Uptake of deuterium into proteins of fertilized and unfertilized Arbacia eggs suspended in heavy water. The Journal of general physiology, 35(4), 639–643. https://doi.org/10.1085/jgp.35.4.639

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2147312/ --> https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2147312/pdf/639.pdf

Might you have recommendations for reading more about these dynamics in deuterium metabolism between mother and child, and deuterium's function in growth (cell division)?

Thank you muchly.

 

Do not have.
----
Noted that dr Boros now is studying benefits of higher deuterium content, in seals. Stronger tendons, allows them to dive deeper.

...

 

That is intriguing, thanks for that note.

 

Possibly @Pebbles has more information on this topic.

 

WIll ask, but as far as I know, he is teaching deutenomics at Vrije Universitat in Netherlands and has some ongoing projects w Jeff Leach - one of them deuterium level as measurement for electrosmog effects.