1. Registering for the Forum

    We require a human profile pic upon registration on this forum.

    After registration is submitted, you will receive a confirmation email, which should contain a link to confirm your intent to register for the forum. At this point, you will not yet be registered on the forum.

    Our Support staff will manually approve your account within 24 hours, and you will get a notification. This is to prevent the many spam account signups which we receive on a daily basis.

    If you have any problems completing this registration, please email support@jackkruse.com and we will assist you.

Climate change is a facade to hide geo-engineering of Earth

Discussion in 'Cold Thermogenesis' started by Jack Kruse, Feb 5, 2017.

  1. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Alex97232 likes this.
  2. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Alex97232 likes this.
  3. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

  4. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    What else could it hide? Dr. John Hall, MD, in his 2009 book "A New Breed: Satellite Terrorism in America", names six satellite weapons: (1) Indoor imaging x-ray-based
    (2) Electromagnetic radiation
    (3) Microwave
    (4) Laser
    (5) Ultrasound – “As ultrasonic beams approach the bandwidth of microwaves, they are capable of thermal injury. However, they are mostly used to exert physical pressure.”
    (6) Particle beam – worst weapon, “a beam of positrons or neutrinos” that melt tissue
  5. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Think of yourself and your species as a very minor character in the scientific story of fatigue by "tecnologic progress" just under your ability to perceive by a puppetmaster.
  6. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

  7. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Top NOAA Scientist Blows The Lid Off Climate Change [..] Manipulated Global Warming Data ~ See Video & Story here at this link: http://wp.me/p2X3AR-lCC
  8. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator


    The debate about climate change is finished - because it has been categorically proved NOT to exist, one of the world's best known climate change sceptic has claimed.

    John Coleman, who co-founded the Weather Channel, shocked academics by insisting the theory of man-made climate change was no longer scientifically credible.

    Instead, what 'little evidence' there is for rising global temperatures points to a 'natural phenomenon' within a developing eco-system.
    Alex97232 likes this.
  9. Thaddeus Owen

    Thaddeus Owen New Member

    I agree. I actually work in sustainability and used to perform Greenhouse Gas Accounting for fortune 500 companies.
    It's a red herring.
    Climate change is real. The climate is always changing and always will.
    Are we making it change? No. Are we helping it? Maybe. Is that a bad thing? No one knows and it might even be a good thing. If a mini ice age occurs in a few years, that extra carbon will be really nice.
    But it's a distraction from real issues.
    Toxic chemicals in furniture, automobiles, planes, rivers etc.. nnEMF, fluoride in the water and oh so much more.
    My job now has moved on from climate change, thankfully, to keeping toxic chemicals out of furniture, and of course my side hobby in biohacking.

    Great job Jack taking a position on this with some truth.
  10. WildForWesties

    WildForWesties New Member

    Whether or not humans contribute to changes in the climate, I agree the real issues are as you state - humans are responsible for the total pollution of EVERY aspect of the environment we require for living a healthy life. Thank you for doing the work you do!
  11. Sheddie

    Sheddie New Member

    Big agree! ...With a small 'Windbag's insert:'

    "...humans are responsible for the [buying & consumption of the myriad products causing] the total pollution of EVERY aspect of the environment we require for living a healthy life."

    Just like sheepishly paying taxes and watching bankers create imaginary fractionated fiat funds, WE-the-markets 'want' the manufacturers' products without questioning the source-added toxic constituents through the product or its packaging or its transportation to local warehouses.

    Why wait for slow~motion governmental process to take years/decades/to the end of time... to chat things up in Congress and be 'treated' as a topic in the fake media? Or, for example, wait for government to make those for-your-own-good laws, like, you must have poisons in or 'methods' applied to your USDA/FDA foods and drugs? (To list a few; fake 'enriched' foods, gamma-radiated 'fresh' produce (enzyme-free), pharmaceutical adjuvants, fluoridated/chlorinated public water systems [ozonated water works for America now!], endocrine disrupting fragrances rising to meet atmospheric military mystery clouds...)

    There's more (swift) power in the global retail markets' pocketbook now, than The Vote in single, compartmented 'democratic nation' politics. Who is the (unconscious) market to buy, for example 5G -- coming to your EMF-polluted doorstep and through your closed doors very soon? You are. Can we not, here & now say, 'No, we're just not going to buy it, unless and until you make it safe and de-construct the present communications technology -- Mr Banker-backed, Elite-Puppeteer Corporate Factory Owners!'

    With one clear up/down voice at critical mass volume, and with disciplined determination, humans can start to have a say in self-defense against gradualism to the genocide upon us.

    Pollution? As without, so within? Similarly, talk back to the movers & shakers in media mind-control products and 'methods.' Down with the FCC, DOJ, and the rest in mass murder by alphabetized malice aforethought ? Huh.
    Alex97232 likes this.
  12. Da-mo

    Da-mo Gold

Share This Page