1. Registering for the Forum

    We require a human profile pic upon registration on this forum.

    After registration is submitted, you will receive a confirmation email, which should contain a link to confirm your intent to register for the forum. At this point, you will not yet be registered on the forum.

    Our Support staff will manually approve your account within 24 hours, and you will get a notification. This is to prevent the many spam account signups which we receive on a daily basis.

    If you have any problems completing this registration, please email support@jackkruse.com and we will assist you.

BITCOIN ENERGY FUD/ESG ARGUMENT IS PSEUDOSCIENCE = WEF

Discussion in 'The Kruse Longevity Center' started by Jack Kruse, Jun 14, 2021.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    The higher fossil fuel prices go, the more expensive renewables become. Producing windmills and solar panels requires a tremendous amount of fossil fuels that permeates all the way through the supply chain. Green energy is not sustainable in a Petrodollar world.
     
    GavinH, caroline and ND Hauf like this.
  2. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    GavinH and caroline like this.
  3. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    Few intellectual tyrannies can be more recalcitrant than the truths that everybody knows and nearly no one can defend with any decent data. If you subtract the propaganda from the data you can see clearly how the WEF narratives have been used in COVID/Jab data. And few intellectual activities can be more salutary than attempts to find out whether these rocks of ages might crumble at the slightest tap of an informational hammer. Martin Luther King said it best, “Every time we witness an injustice of thought, and do not act, we train our character to become passive in its presence, and thereby eventually lose the ability to to defend ourselves and the one’s we love to create the life we need.”

     
    Johan Lindstrøm, caroline and GavinH like this.
  4. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    There is an interesting CCP story as it relates to their carbon footprint.

    We know that the COVID Wuhan lockdown causes a massive 45 ppm drop in CO2 during the spring of 2020. How do we know?

    Of key significance is the extraordinary set of 45-year exceptions in CO2 emissions produced out of China during June 2018 through March 2020 timeframes. The dotted red line in Exhibit 11.4 below depicts 2018 CO2 ppm measured at Mauna Loa observatory, while the solid red line shows 2019.
    [​IMG]

    Parts per million measures during those two years were anywhere from 2 to 6 standard deviations (sigmas) lower than their 45-year well-established precedent. This was an extraordinary set of occurrences that dovetailed nicely into being explained by Chinese lockdown, once December 2019 arrived. The key inference here is that the prior suppressed periods could only be explained by Chinese lockdown (regional) as well. A brushfire-approach lockdown practice began in earnest in May of 2018.

    In addition, notice that as soon as China ceased its lockdown of just Hubei province on 8 April 2020, the world immediately experienced a 45-year record in CO2 ppm spring increase (grey ‘2020’ line on the left-hand side of Exhibit 11.4 above). Because 47% of the West was locked down at this time, this demonstrated clearly that it is China, and not Western nations, which impart the most significant impact in terms of CO2 production globally. Sorry, Greta your ideas the global elites gave you just went boom.


    Finally, the reader should note that I am not talking about China enacting a comprehensive lockdown of its entire nation and economy in this context – rather just small regions where a Covid outbreak was known to exist (potentially or even likely known on the part of very few persons). The actions could be excused through a cover story regarding influenza quarantines (2018/19 flu season was 6x heavier as we observed in Exhibit 11.3 below), African Swine Fever, and H5N1 bird flu mitigation efforts, 2019 flood alerts, or a variety of other exculpatory rationales.
    [​IMG]

    When China locked down only Hubei province on 23 January 2020 for example (4% of the population) – this drove the largest CO2 reduction on the entire chart depicted above in green. Thus China did not have to undertake drastic nationwide measures in order to effect these smaller-variance 2018 (tomato) and 2019 (red) charted CO2 ppm trend lines. Regardless, China’s CCP contention that they did not know about Covid-19 until late December 2019 is belied by the chart below. So we know they were lying – now we are only negotiating how much they were FOS.

    The red trend line ppm suppression impetus in July 2019 (or 2018 for that matter) did not just coincidentally give way to a convenient, exactly-timed, and same-magnitude Covid lockdown suppression tend line in December 2019. Such a suggestion broaches incredulity. No, this entire ppm suppression all stemmed from one single factor the CCP lockdown.
     
  5. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    GavinH likes this.
  6. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

  7. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    The ESG divestment movement should be publicly shamed as a virtue-signaling, financially idiotic, and most importantly immoral movement that perpetuates poverty and threatens freedom. All legal pressures to adopt it should be eliminated. ESG should be boycotted wherever possible.

    The anti-energy ESG movement should be replaced with a pro-energy "long-term value creation" movement. Creating sustained value for companies' owners requires a long-term perspective. But that means valuing cost-effective energy, not destroying it.

    My full moral demolition of "ESG investing," with references. Please share this with any financial institutions you are connected with. ESG needs to be stripped of its false claim to morality to that finance can go back to fueling cost-effective energy.

    https://alexepstein.substack.com/p/the-esg-movement-is-anti-energy-anti
     
  8. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

    "ESG investing" in its current form is similar to people who take selfies of themselves in fancy locations to show they were there, while barely experiencing it for real. Mostly theater, little substance.
     
    caroline, John Schumacher and ND Hauf like this.
  9. Jack Kruse

    Jack Kruse Administrator

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page